跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:What Do Current Systematic Generalization Tasks Miss? A Reasoning-Centered Analysis

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2609.19212v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Systematic generalization, the ability to solve novel problems by recombining known atomic elements, is central to human intelligence but difficult to study rigorously under controlled settings. Existing studies therefore rely on simplifications such as approximately linear action composition, productivity-based tests, and action-explicit goals, which make systematic generalization easier to study but omit some essential aspects of this capability. To characterize what these simplifications miss, we adopt a reasoning-centered lens and introduce TranSGrid, a testbed that brings deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning together within a unified task. Experiments with seven Transformers on 4,800 TranSGrid instan…

來源arXiv AI作者: Chengwen Qi, Deheng Ye, Yatao Bian
待翻譯:What Do Current Systematic Generalization Tasks Miss? A Reasoning-Centered Analysis
報告錯誤

更正渠道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 16 Sep 2026] Title:What Do Current Systematic Generalization Tasks Miss? A Reasoning-Centered Analysis View a PDF of the paper titled What Do Current Systematic Generalization Tasks Miss? A Reasoning-Centered Analysis, by Chengwen Qi and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Systematic generalization, the ability to solve novel problems by recombining known atomic elements, is central to human intelligence but difficult to study rigorously under controlled settings. Existing studies therefore rely on simplifications such as approximately linear action composition, productivity-based tests, and action-explicit goals, which make systematic generalization easier to study but omit some essential aspects of this capability. To characterize what these simplifications miss, we adopt a reasoning-centered lens and introduce TranSGrid, a testbed that brings deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning together within a unified task. Experiments with seven Transformers on 4,800 TranSGrid instances show that all models perform much worse on TranSGrid than on a held-out test set: the largest model solves 79.6% of the test set, but only 55.3% of TranSGrid and 15.8% of the hardest subset. The gap remains within the training length range, showing that productivity alone is not sufficient to evaluate systematic generalization. Additionally, we reintroduce the other two simplifications into TranSGrid: one variant makes actions compose almost linearly (reducing the inductive demand), the other makes goals action-explicit (reducing the abductive one). In both, solve rates return to roughly the test set level, showing that either simplification alone is enough to reduce TranSGrid to an ordinary held-out test set. Together, our results show that existing tasks reduce either or both of the inductive and abductive demands, and that comprehensively measuring systematic generalization requires a task that involves all three forms of reasoning. Comments: Preprint. Under review Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.19212 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.19212v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.19212 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Chengwen Qi [view email] [v1] Wed, 16 Sep 2026 11:53:03 UTC (1,140 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled What Do Current Systematic Generalization Tasks Miss? A Reasoning-Centered Analysis, by Chengwen Qi and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

工程師進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級元數據。
  • arXiv:2609.19212v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Systematic generalization, the ability to solve novel problems by recombining known atomic elements, is central to human intelligen…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。