跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:SWORD: Wikidata-based Distortions Reveal Hidden Cross-Lingual Inconsistencies in LLM Factual Error Rejection

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2609.09349v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern LLMs demonstrate impressive multilingual performance, yet standard benchmarks primarily reward selecting correct answers rather than evaluating genuine factual understanding. We introduce Systematic Wikidata-based Object-Relation Distortion (SWORD), a benchmark that evaluates whether models consistently reject factual errors across languages. SWORD generates syntactically well-formed but factually incorrect statements in eight widely spoken languages through controlled perturbations of Wikidata triples, ranging from random entity substitutions to semantically plausible property-based selections. Our distortion-based evaluation surfaces two critical insights that remain entirely obscured by conventional benc…

來源arXiv Computational Linguistics作者: Sanghyeok Park, Minji Kang, Hosung Kwak, Jinhyuk Yun
待翻譯:SWORD: Wikidata-based Distortions Reveal Hidden Cross-Lingual Inconsistencies in LLM Factual Error Rejection
報告錯誤

更正渠道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 8 Sep 2026] Title:SWORD: Wikidata-based Distortions Reveal Hidden Cross-Lingual Inconsistencies in LLM Factual Error Rejection View a PDF of the paper titled SWORD: Wikidata-based Distortions Reveal Hidden Cross-Lingual Inconsistencies in LLM Factual Error Rejection, by Sanghyeok Park and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Modern LLMs demonstrate impressive multilingual performance, yet standard benchmarks primarily reward selecting correct answers rather than evaluating genuine factual understanding. We introduce Systematic Wikidata-based Object-Relation Distortion (SWORD), a benchmark that evaluates whether models consistently reject factual errors across languages. SWORD generates syntactically well-formed but factually incorrect statements in eight widely spoken languages through controlled perturbations of Wikidata triples, ranging from random entity substitutions to semantically plausible property-based selections. Our distortion-based evaluation surfaces two critical insights that remain entirely obscured by conventional benchmarks. First, models counterintuitively achieve higher accuracy on semantically plausible distortions than on nonsensical random substitutions, suggesting reliance on distributional familiarity rather than genuine factual verification. Second, models exhibiting comparable baseline accuracy across languages show substantial performance degradation specifically on (East) Asian languages when presented with distorted statements, with cross-lingual performance gaps reaching up to 28 percentage points (49\% relative reduction) in some models. These findings demonstrate that multilingual factual reasoning involves asymmetric capabilities that aggregate accuracy metrics systematically obscure. Comments: 20 pages, 12 figures, 6 tables (including appendix) Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2609.09349 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.09349v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.09349 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Jinhyuk Yun [view email] [v1] Tue, 8 Sep 2026 18:39:01 UTC (863 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled SWORD: Wikidata-based Distortions Reveal Hidden Cross-Lingual Inconsistencies in LLM Factual Error Rejection, by Sanghyeok Park and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

投資人進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級元數據。
  • arXiv:2609.09349v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern LLMs demonstrate impressive multilingual performance, yet standard benchmarks primarily reward selecting correct answers rat…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。