AI News HubLIVE
站內改寫2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:RePro: Proof-Verified Benchmark Rewriting for Reliable Evaluation of LLM Mathematical Problem Solving

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2609.00062v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Data contamination undermines the reliable evaluation of large language models (LLMs) on mathematical problem solving. While rewriting-based evaluation mitigates memorization, existing methods lack guarantees of problem validity and answer correctness. We propose Proof-Verified Benchmark Rewriting (RePro), the first framework to integrate Lean-oriented neural automated theorem provers (ATPs) into benchmark rewriting, which rewrites problems and regenerates answers with correctness ensured by Lean-verified proofs. Experiments on GSM8K and MATH show that RePro's retained rewritten instances achieve 100% well-definedness, feasibility, and answer correctness, while existing methods still produce invalid or incorrect instances. Moreover, several models exhibit accuracy drops on proof-verified rewritten benchmarks, suggesting that their performance is sensitive to surface-level and structural variations and may partly reflect memorization effects. Our source code and data are available at https://github.com/AI4Engi/RePro.

來源arXiv Computational Linguistics作者: Xiyuan Zhou, Zhuoqi Li, Xinlei Wang, Yirui He, Yuhao Wu, Yuheng Cheng, Yan Xu, Junhua Zhao, Jinjin Gu

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

--> [Submitted on 30 Aug 2026] Title:RePro: Proof-Verified Benchmark Rewriting for Reliable Evaluation of LLM Mathematical Problem Solving View a PDF of the paper titled RePro: Proof-Verified Benchmark Rewriting for Reliable Evaluation of LLM Mathematical Problem Solving, by Xiyuan Zhou and 8 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Data contamination undermines the reliable evaluation of large language models (LLMs) on mathematical problem solving. While rewriting-based evaluation mitigates memorization, existing methods lack guarantees of problem validity and answer correctness. We propose Proof-Verified Benchmark Rewriting (RePro), the first framework to integrate Lean-oriented neural automated theorem provers (ATPs) into benchmark rewriting, which rewrites problems and regenerates answers with correctness ensured by Lean-verified proofs. Experiments on GSM8K and MATH show that RePro's retained rewritten instances achieve 100% well-definedness, feasibility, and answer correctness, while existing methods still produce invalid or incorrect instances. Moreover, several models exhibit accuracy drops on proof-verified rewritten benchmarks, suggesting that their performance is sensitive to surface-level and structural variations and may partly reflect memorization effects. Our source code and data are available at this https URL. Comments: Accepted to the EMNLP 2026 Main Conference Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.00062 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.00062v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.00062 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Xiyuan Zhou [view email] [v1] Sun, 30 Aug 2026 14:23:48 UTC (1,870 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled RePro: Proof-Verified Benchmark Rewriting for Reliable Evaluation of LLM Mathematical Problem Solving, by Xiyuan Zhou and 8 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)