跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
站內改寫2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:Putting Captions to the Test: Evaluating Video Caption Quality through Multiple-Choice Question Answering

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:Evaluating video captioning remains a critical challenge for Visual Large Language Models (VLLMs). Existing metrics primarily rely on matching generated text against ground-truth references. This paradigm suffers from the “one-to-many” nature of video description, where high-quality captions are often penalized for lexical mismatches or valid shifts in visual focus. Furthermore, such assessments are typically one-dimensional, failing to provide a fine-grained analysis of caption quality. To address this, we redefine caption quality via information fidelity: A caption must maximize the coverage…

待翻譯:Putting Captions to the Test: Evaluating Video Caption Quality through Multiple-Choice Question Answering
報告錯誤

更正渠道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

content type paperpublished September 2026 Putting Captions to the Test: Evaluating Video Caption Quality through Multiple-Choice Question Answering AuthorsZizhen Wang, Bo Feng, Zhengfeng Lai†, Shiyu Li, Yang Lu, Meng Cao, Ping Huang, Simon Wang View publication Evaluating video captioning remains a critical challenge for Visual Large Language Models (VLLMs). Existing metrics primarily rely on matching generated text against ground-truth references. This paradigm suffers from the “one-to-many” nature of video description, where high-quality captions are often penalized for lexical mismatches or valid shifts in visual focus. Furthermore, such assessments are typically one-dimensional, failing to provide a fine-grained analysis of caption quality. To address this, we redefine caption quality via information fidelity: A caption must maximize the coverage of salient visual information while ensuring strict factuality. We introduce CapQuiz, a novel reference-free benchmark that assesses captions based on their utility in answering human-verified, fine-grained, multiple-choice questions derived from the video. CapQuiz features a hierarchical taxonomy of 10 question types (spanning Descriptive and Inferential categories) across 24 diverse video domains. We further formulate CapF1, a composite metric that synthesizes CapP (measuring factuality) and CapR (measuring coverage). Extensive experiments demonstrate that CapQuiz correlates significantly better with human judgments than existing metrics and offers interpretable insights into model performance. † MBZUAI Institute of Foundation Models Work done while at Apple BalCapRL: A Balanced Framework for RL-Based MLLM Image Captioning May 11, 2026research area Computer Vision, research area Methods and Algorithms Image captioning is one of the most fundamental tasks in computer vision. Owing to its open-ended nature, it has received significant attention in the era of multimodal large language models (MLLMs). In pursuit of ever more detailed and accurate captions, recent work has increasingly turned to reinforcement learning (RL). However, existing captioning-RL methods and evaluation metrics often emphasize a narrow notion of caption quality, inducing… Read more Revisit Large-Scale Image–Caption Data in Pre-training Multimodal Foundation Models April 8, 2025research area Computer Vision, research area Methods and Algorithmsconference ICLR Recent advancements in multimodal models highlight the value of rewritten captions for improving performance, yet key challenges remain. Notably, the role of synthetic captions and their interaction with original web-crawled AltTexts in pre-training is still unclear. Additionally, different multimodal foundation models may have distinct preferences for specific caption formats while the efforts of studying the optimal captions for each foundation… Read more

展開要點與分析

文章情報

投資人進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級元數據。
  • Evaluating video captioning remains a critical challenge for Visual Large Language Models (VLLMs). Existing metrics primarily rely on matching generated text against ground-truth…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。