Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Phronix: The Capability-Centric Learning Paradigm for Agents

Summary

Phronix introduces a capability-centric learning paradigm that lets agentic harnesses acquire, validate, and refine reusable capabilities from their own executions via a predictor-validator-corrector loop, improving first-attempt solve rates, cutting token costs, and boosting correctness and task completion in scientific computing workflows.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Hariharan Devarajan, Neeraj Rajesh, Aniruddha Marathe, Nikoli Dryden, Kin Ng, Michela Taufer
Phronix: The Capability-Centric Learning Paradigm for Agents
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 22 Oct 2026]

Title:Phronix: The Capability-Centric Learning Paradigm for Agents

View a PDF of the paper titled Phronix: The Capability-Centric Learning Paradigm for Agents, by Hariharan Devarajan and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Scientific computing increasingly relies on large language model-based agents for performance engineering tasks such as instrumentation, analysis, and workflow porting. However, agent effectiveness depends heavily on the surrounding harness, which typically relies on manually written skills and curated memory. This limits autonomous learning, forcing agents to repeatedly rediscover solutions rather than retain and reuse knowledge from prior executions. We introduce Phronix, a capability-centric learning paradigm that enables agentic harnesses to acquire, validate, and refine reusable capabilities from their own executions. Phronix operates through a predictor-validator-corrector loop: MCP tools and associated skills propose solutions, tool executions validate them, and observed outcomes refine the stored capabilities. It distills every observed interaction into a capability store and researches a failing task rather than abandoning it. First, such learned capabilities solve a recurring task on the first attempt in 93-95% of cases across every model, significantly reducing solution non-determinism and improving reliability. Second, Phronix turns an agent's own execution into 7.6-30.8 durable capabilities per task without user instruction, and creation falls below two once the needed capability exists. Third, warm-start runs consume only 0.38-0.40 million tokens per task, which is three to four times less than a single baseline attempt, while a cold-start costs no more than the baseline. On the 1000 Genome Pegasus workflow, instrumenting a production application for I/O performance analysis, Phronix passes all 11 correctness checks against six for the baseline harness, and also lifts the task solving rates of two cheaper models from 29% and 27% of SWE-bench tasks solved to 91% and 87%, respectively, matching the performance of the most expensive evaluated model.

Comments: 11 pages plus references

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.31789 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.31789v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.31789

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Hariharan Devarajan [view email] [v1] Thu, 22 Oct 2026 18:29:52 UTC (204 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Phronix: The Capability-Centric Learning Paradigm for Agents, by Hariharan Devarajan and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Phronix uses a predictor-validator-corrector loop to distill every interaction into a capability store and researches failing tasks instead of abandoning them.
  • Learned capabilities solve recurring tasks on the first attempt in 93-95% of cases and yield 7.6-30.8 durable capabilities per task without user instruction.
  • Warm-start runs consume only 0.38-0.40 million tokens per task, three to four times less than a single baseline attempt, while cold-start costs no more than the baseline.
  • On the 1000 Genome Pegasus workflow, Phronix passes all 11 correctness checks versus six for the baseline and lifts two cheaper models' SWE-bench solve rates from 29% and 27% to 91% and 87%.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.