Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

IFC-SSL-Bench: Benchmarking Self-Supervised Learning for Annotation-Efficient Multispectral Imaging Flow Cytometry

Summary

IFC-SSL-Bench is a modular framework that systematically evaluates six self-supervised learning approaches across four backbones on two heterogeneous multispectral imaging flow cytometry datasets. SSL matches fully supervised baselines using as little as 5% of annotations for morphological classification, with MoCo-v2 plus ConvNeXt emerging as the top configuration and initialization strategy depending on task domain.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Angelo Jovin Yamachui Sitcheu, Roxana-Teodora Fetescu, Thomas Lautenschlager, Nils Friederich, Linus Schilpp, Stephan Allgeier, Luca Deininger, Daniel H\"ubschmann, Ralf Mikut
IFC-SSL-Bench: Benchmarking Self-Supervised Learning for Annotation-Efficient Multispectral Imaging Flow Cytometry
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 22 Oct 2026]

Title:IFC-SSL-Bench: Benchmarking Self-Supervised Learning for Annotation-Efficient Multispectral Imaging Flow Cytometry

View a PDF of the paper titled IFC-SSL-Bench: Benchmarking Self-Supervised Learning for Annotation-Efficient Multispectral Imaging Flow Cytometry, by Angelo Jovin Yamachui Sitcheu and 7 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Imaging Flow Cytometry (IFC) generates large multispectral datasets, yet the need for expert annotations bottlenecks the development of supervised deep learning models. While Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) offers a solution, its application to IFC remains fragmented and lacks systematic benchmarking. To address this, we present IFC-SSL-Bench, a modular framework for evaluating SSL in IFC. We benchmark six SSL approaches across four backbones on two heterogeneous datasets. By assessing downstream classification performance across annotation regimes of the training sets (1%-100%), we quantify annotation efficiency and identify optimal configurations for high-dimensional biological imaging. SSL matches the performance of fully supervised baselines trained on 100% of annotated data while using as little as 5% of annotations for morphological classification, with advantages in low-data regimes below 5%. Across both datasets, the contrastive approach MoCo-v2 paired with ConvNeXt backbones emerged as the top-performing configuration, with ConvNeXtV1-T best for immunological synapse classification and ConvNeXtV2-T for morphological classification. We identify a clear pattern in transfer dynamics: ImageNet initialization benefits morphological classification, consistent with its visual similarity to natural images, whereas random initialization better captures the more domain-specific immunological synapse classification. SSL elevates class-specific F1-scores by over 35 percentage points for structurally complex classes at 1% of annotated data. We synthesize these insights into a unified set of guidelines for deploying self-supervised workflows in high-throughput IFC, and release the benchmark as a resource for future work.

Comments: 35 pages, six main figures, seven supplementary figures, five tables and four supplemntary tables

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.31848 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.31848v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.31848

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Angelo Jovin Yamachui Sitcheu [view email] [v1] Thu, 22 Oct 2026 19:32:11 UTC (34,520 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled IFC-SSL-Bench: Benchmarking Self-Supervised Learning for Annotation-Efficient Multispectral Imaging Flow Cytometry, by Angelo Jovin Yamachui Sitcheu and 7 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • SSL matches fully supervised baselines trained on 100% of annotations while using as little as 5% for morphological classification, with larger gains below 5%.
  • MoCo-v2 with ConvNeXt backbones is the top-performing configuration overall; ConvNeXtV1-T leads immunological synapse classification and ConvNeXtV2-T leads morphological classification.
  • ImageNet initialization benefits morphological classification, while random initialization works better for the more domain-specific immunological synapse task.
  • At 1% annotated data, SSL raises class-specific F1-scores by more than 35 percentage points for structurally complex classes.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.

IFC-SSL-Bench: Benchmarking Self-Supervised Learning for Annotation-Efficient Multispectral Imaging Flow Cytometry | AI News Hub