[Submitted on 22 Oct 2026]
Title:Full-Weight VLA Fine-Tuning Without an fp32 Master Copy Silently Erases Most Updates
View a PDF of the paper titled Full-Weight VLA Fine-Tuning Without an fp32 Master Copy Silently Erases Most Updates, by Shubham Singh
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:When a vision-language-action (VLA) model is fine-tuned with its trainable weights in bfloat16 (bf16) and no fp32 master copy, AdamW writes each update straight into bf16, silently rounding away any update smaller than 1/512 of a weight. In 9 of 12 open VLA codebases a default or documented recipe trains this way, 4 on full weight matrices, including LeRobot's SmolVLA default and its $\pi_0$/$\pi_{0.5}$ guides. In our LIBERO runs without the copy, a probe every 100 steps finds at least 79% of updates to bf16 weights erased. On the Hugging Face Hub, 99% of sampled full-weight SmolVLA fine-tunes store the action expert in bf16, and 84% of recent $\pi_{0.5}$ fine-tunes with a training configuration set the bf16 flag. On LIBERO-Object, with rules fixed in advance, an fp32 copy raises success over LeRobot's storage from 4.3% to 49.3% for SmolVLA and from 5.1% to 80.9% for $\pi_{0.5}$ at a ten-times lower learning rate, where both models are undertrained, and from 89.0% to 97.7% for $\pi_{0.5}$ at its default rate. For SmolVLA at its default rate it adds 10.2 points with open-loop 50-action chunks but only 4.2 when re-planning every 10 actions. In these five comparisons and two more against SmolVLA with every trainable weight in bf16, every run with the copy beats every run without it (p
new | recent | 2026-10
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
SciX
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)