跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:MechReason: Benchmarking Multi-Image Multi-Hop Reasoning in Mechanical Engineering

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2609.16012v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Despite significant progress in general visual question answering and cross-modal understanding, multimodal large language models still face a pronounced gap in evaluation for complex reasoning within the mechanical engineering domain. Existing benchmarks predominantly focus on rudimentary tasks such as drawing recognition, CAD interpretation, or single-chart querying, falling short of assessing whether models can integrate multiple images, textual conditions, physical principles, and engineering constraints to perform multi-step reasoning when confronted with authentic, intricate mechanical problems. To address this, we introduce MechReason, a benchmark derived from real mechanical engineering papers, comprising…

來源arXiv Computer Vision作者: Tengyue Wang, Kang An, Chenxu Du, Zhongyu Yang, Yuanchi Zhu, Xinqi Yang, Hebao Zhu, Ziliang Wang, FaQiang Qian, Yunli Yang, Qibing Ren
待翻譯:MechReason: Benchmarking Multi-Image Multi-Hop Reasoning in Mechanical Engineering
報告錯誤

更正渠道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 21 Aug 2026] Title:MechReason: Benchmarking Multi-Image Multi-Hop Reasoning in Mechanical Engineering View a PDF of the paper titled MechReason: Benchmarking Multi-Image Multi-Hop Reasoning in Mechanical Engineering, by Tengyue Wang and 10 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Despite significant progress in general visual question answering and cross-modal understanding, multimodal large language models still face a pronounced gap in evaluation for complex reasoning within the mechanical engineering domain. Existing benchmarks predominantly focus on rudimentary tasks such as drawing recognition, CAD interpretation, or single-chart querying, falling short of assessing whether models can integrate multiple images, textual conditions, physical principles, and engineering constraints to perform multi-step reasoning when confronted with authentic, intricate mechanical problems. To address this, we introduce MechReason, a benchmark derived from real mechanical engineering papers, comprising 12k question-answer pairs with explicit reasoning-chain annotations and 21k visual materials spanning nine evidence types, including statistical charts, parameter tables, engineering drawings, microscopic images, simulation images, system architectures, real mechanical scene photos, CAD model images and manufacturing flowcharts. MechReason covers eight task types across four reasoning dimensions: explanation, prediction, design, and diagnosis. We devise a four-stage construction pipeline: we first extract core engineering claims and decompose their supporting evidence into premises, reasoning processes, conclusions, and corroborative evidence; we then generate shortcut-preventing questions by masking posterior verification information; finally, we apply multimodal quality validation to ensure task quality and multi-hop nature. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that MechReason is highly challenging, with even the most advanced models achieving only 62.89\% accuracy. Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) Cite as: arXiv:2609.16012 [cs.CV] (or arXiv:2609.16012v1 [cs.CV] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.16012 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Kang An [view email] [v1] Fri, 21 Aug 2026 09:18:25 UTC (2,634 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled MechReason: Benchmarking Multi-Image Multi-Hop Reasoning in Mechanical Engineering, by Tengyue Wang and 10 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CV new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

投資人進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級元數據。
  • arXiv:2609.16012v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Despite significant progress in general visual question answering and cross-modal understanding, multimodal large language models s…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。