跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:How Prompt Style Affects AI Accuracy and Speed in Competitive Programming

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2610.30223v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used in competitive programming, and their outputs are sensitive to how a prompt is phrased. Prior work has compared prompt strategies for accuracy on competitive programming, but not for runtime speed, and has not situated the results against human performance. In an exploratory study of one prompt in each of nine styles on GPT-5.5 across three accuracy tasks from the International Olympiad in Informatics (IOI) and two NP-hard speed tasks, we found that no single prompt was best: the strongest prompt depended on the task type and on whether results were summarized by the mean or the median, suggesting that, at least for these tasks, prompt style should be matched to the obje…

來源arXiv Machine Learning作者: Saad B. Alarifi, Mohammed A. Alam
待翻譯:How Prompt Style Affects AI Accuracy and Speed in Competitive Programming
報告錯誤

更正渠道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 21 Oct 2026] Title:How Prompt Style Affects AI Accuracy and Speed in Competitive Programming View a PDF of the paper titled How Prompt Style Affects AI Accuracy and Speed in Competitive Programming, by Saad B. Alarifi and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large language models are increasingly used in competitive programming, and their outputs are sensitive to how a prompt is phrased. Prior work has compared prompt strategies for accuracy on competitive programming, but not for runtime speed, and has not situated the results against human performance. In an exploratory study of one prompt in each of nine styles on GPT-5.5 across three accuracy tasks from the International Olympiad in Informatics (IOI) and two NP-hard speed tasks, we found that no single prompt was best: the strongest prompt depended on the task type and on whether results were summarized by the mean or the median, suggesting that, at least for these tasks, prompt style should be matched to the objective rather than treated as universal. Many differences in mean scores came from a few outlier runs, showing that evaluating prompting by a single metric can obscure how much its effectiveness varies. Compared descriptively with human IOI contestants, who worked under different conditions, the AI was neither strictly better nor strictly worse, exceeding the average contestant on one task but falling short on the other two. By extending prompt comparison from accuracy to runtime speed and grounding it against human performance, this study gives a broader picture of how prompt style affects competitive programming performance. Comments: 10 pages, 3 figures, 7 tables. Code and data: this https URL Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Software Engineering (cs.SE) Cite as: arXiv:2610.30223 [cs.LG] (or arXiv:2610.30223v1 [cs.LG] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.30223 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Saad Alarifi [view email] [v1] Wed, 21 Oct 2026 17:11:18 UTC (44 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled How Prompt Style Affects AI Accuracy and Speed in Competitive Programming, by Saad B. Alarifi and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.LG new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs cs.SE References & Citations SciX Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

工程師進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級元數據。
  • arXiv:2610.30223v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used in competitive programming, and their outputs are sensitive to how a prompt is phrased.…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。