跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全3 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:Feature Competition and Its Representational Origins in Vision Language Models: Evidence from the Stroop Paradigm

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2610.12650v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When you ask a vision-language model (VLM) a question with an image, it answers your question based on the image. But to act means to choose: saying one thing means choosing to respond not say another. This becomes an issue when the image contains multiple features that equally relate to the question at hand: how would VLMs choose to respond? This problem is precisely studied by the classical Stroop task in psychology: among a set of deliberately designed images whose text and color conflicts (e.g., \textcolor{blue}{RED}), participants are instructed to report the color. We adapt this psychological paradigm to a benchmark and prompted a range of contrastive and generative VLMs on their behavior. Across models, we…

來源arXiv Computer Vision作者: Nurb\"uke Teker, Rui Xiao, Zeynep Akata, Shuchen Wu
待翻譯:Feature Competition and Its Representational Origins in Vision Language Models: Evidence from the Stroop Paradigm
報告錯誤

更正渠道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 8 Oct 2026] Title:Feature Competition and Its Representational Origins in Vision Language Models: Evidence from the Stroop Paradigm View a PDF of the paper titled Feature Competition and Its Representational Origins in Vision Language Models: Evidence from the Stroop Paradigm, by Nurb\"uke Teker and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:When you ask a vision-language model (VLM) a question with an image, it answers your question based on the image. But to act means to choose: saying one thing means choosing to respond not say another. This becomes an issue when the image contains multiple features that equally relate to the question at hand: how would VLMs choose to respond? This problem is precisely studied by the classical Stroop task in psychology: among a set of deliberately designed images whose text and color conflicts (e.g., \textcolor{blue}{RED}), participants are instructed to report the color. We adapt this psychological paradigm to a benchmark and prompted a range of contrastive and generative VLMs on their behavior. Across models, we observe a persistent bias toward the feature of text in Stroop images: when text and color disagree, models preferentially generate responses centered to the text rather than color. We then opened the black box and examined the source of this bias and why certain features influences the model's behavior more than others. In the embedding space, we found that textual cues are represented more strongly and separably than color cues. This representational asymmetry predicts intervention success: steering models toward text-related directions is substantially easier than steering them toward color-related directions. Using a classical psychological paradigm, we demonstrate, at both behavioral and representational levels, that distinct features within the same image can exert unequal influence on VLM behavior. Our findings suggest that VLMs assign different degrees of saliency to different features within the same image, highlighting the need to understand how cue-specific saliency shapes their performance in widely used downstream applications. Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) Cite as: arXiv:2610.12650 [cs.CV] (or arXiv:2610.12650v1 [cs.CV] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.12650 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Shuchen Wu [view email] [v1] Thu, 8 Oct 2026 19:13:43 UTC (5,267 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Feature Competition and Its Representational Origins in Vision Language Models: Evidence from the Stroop Paradigm, by Nurb\"uke Teker and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.CV new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

工程師進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級元數據。
  • arXiv:2610.12650v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When you ask a vision-language model (VLM) a question with an image, it answers your question based on the image. But to act means…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。