跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:CriticGen: Generation-Aware Evaluation as Actionable Feedback

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2609.05439v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current evaluation methods for large language models are coarse-grained and decoupled from generation, producing generic explanations that fail to provide actionable feedback for model improvement. We propose CriticGen, a fine-grained, generation-aware evaluation framework that turns evaluation into actionable control for answer improvement. CriticGen first generates sample-specific evaluation dimensions and scoring criteria under high-level categories such as subjective, objective, and self-derived constraints. These criteria then serve as a dynamic rubric for jointly producing a score, a reason, an executable refinement suggestion, and a refined answer. This rubric-conditioned refinement process enables models t…

來源arXiv AI作者: Huifang Du, Zecheng Zuo, Sen Wang, Chenghao Fan, Haofen Wang, Yehui Yang
待翻譯:CriticGen: Generation-Aware Evaluation as Actionable Feedback
報告錯誤

更正渠道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 23 Jul 2026] Title:CriticGen: Generation-Aware Evaluation as Actionable Feedback View a PDF of the paper titled CriticGen: Generation-Aware Evaluation as Actionable Feedback, by Huifang Du and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Current evaluation methods for large language models are coarse-grained and decoupled from generation, producing generic explanations that fail to provide actionable feedback for model improvement. We propose CriticGen, a fine-grained, generation-aware evaluation framework that turns evaluation into actionable control for answer improvement. CriticGen first generates sample-specific evaluation dimensions and scoring criteria under high-level categories such as subjective, objective, and self-derived constraints. These criteria then serve as a dynamic rubric for jointly producing a score, a reason, an executable refinement suggestion, and a refined answer. This rubric-conditioned refinement process enables models to diagnose flaws and perform targeted answer improvement. Experimental results show that fine-grained evaluation should be both instance-specific and actionable. CriticGen induces higher-quality rubrics, improving relevance/coverage from 3.33/4.03 to 3.97/4.24. CriticGen also achieves the best score correlations, with 0.9556 Pearson and 0.9560 Spearman, and raises the F1 of criterion-grounded reasons and executable suggestions from 0.6369/0.5994 to 0.7554/0.7900. Crucially, its feedback translates into reliable answer improvement, improving 73.17% of answers with a 93.28% non-degradation rate. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.05439 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.05439v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05439 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Huifang Du [view email] [v1] Thu, 23 Jul 2026 07:32:12 UTC (1,091 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled CriticGen: Generation-Aware Evaluation as Actionable Feedback, by Huifang Du and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

投資人進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級元數據。
  • arXiv:2609.05439v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current evaluation methods for large language models are coarse-grained and decoupled from generation, producing generic explanatio…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。