Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Beyond On-Policy vs. Off-Policy: At What Level Should LLM Agent Distillation Follow the Student?

Summary

This paper introduces a hierarchical agent distillation framework that separates two levels of on-policiness: which policy induces the interaction history and which policy generates the token prefix of the current action. Across three models and four interactive environments, student-induced histories with teacher-generated action prefixes generally give the strongest standalone signal, while following the student at both levels performs worst. However, fully on-policy data helps when mixed with other configurations, pairing across levels matters beyond the overall amount of on-policy data, and front-loading teacher-generated contexts before delaying fully on-policy contexts outperforms a static mixture.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Ya Gao, Zhengtao Zou, Pekka Marttinen
Beyond On-Policy vs. Off-Policy: At What Level Should LLM Agent Distillation Follow the Student?
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 22 Oct 2026]

Title:Beyond On-Policy vs. Off-Policy: At What Level Should LLM Agent Distillation Follow the Student?

View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond On-Policy vs. Off-Policy: At What Level Should LLM Agent Distillation Follow the Student?, by Ya Gao and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Distilling interactive LLM agents requires choosing between teacher-generated demonstrations and student-generated experience, corresponding broadly to off-policy and on-policy distillation. While both have proven effective, we argue that this distinction is inherently hierarchical: the policy that induces an interaction history need not be the same as the policy that generates the token prefix of the current action. We introduce a hierarchical agent distillation framework that formalizes these two levels of on-policiness and enables explicit control over their pairing, mixture proportions, and training schedule. We study this problem through self-distillation, where a frozen teacher has access to task guidance unavailable to the student, and conduct a three-stage controlled study across three models and four interactive environments. We find that student-induced histories paired with teacher-generated action prefixes generally provide the strongest standalone training signal, whereas following the student at both levels generally performs worst. Nevertheless, fully on-policy data becomes beneficial when incorporated into a mixture with other configurations. Moreover, mixtures with identical teacher/student proportions at each level can yield substantially different performance, showing that how the two levels are paired matters beyond the overall amount of on-policy data. Finally, front-loading fully teacher-generated contexts and delaying fully on-policy contexts improves over a static mixture. These findings provide practical principles for deciding where, how much, and when agent distillation should follow the student.

Comments: Under review

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.31918 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.31918v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.31918

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ya Gao [view email] [v1] Thu, 22 Oct 2026 21:10:47 UTC (433 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond On-Policy vs. Off-Policy: At What Level Should LLM Agent Distillation Follow the Student?, by Ya Gao and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • The paper formalizes agent distillation as two hierarchical levels of on-policiness: interaction-history induction and action-prefix generation.
  • Student-induced histories paired with teacher-generated action prefixes generally provide the strongest standalone training signal, whereas fully following the student at both levels performs worst.
  • Mixtures with identical teacher/student proportions at each level can perform very differently, showing that how the levels are paired matters beyond the total amount of on-policy data.
  • Front-loading fully teacher-generated contexts and delaying fully on-policy contexts improves over a static mixture.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.