[Submitted on 12 Sep 2026]
Title:Who May Overrule the Agent? Evidence-Gated Authority in LLM Review Institutions
View a PDF of the paper titled Who May Overrule the Agent? Evidence-Gated Authority in LLM Review Institutions, by Fuad Ali
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Multi-agent language-model systems often add a reviewer to improve an upstream agent's decision. Yet a reviewer can both repair errors and replace decisions that were already correct. We study this as a problem of institutional jurisdiction: conditional on the same proposal, task information, model, and review output, when is the reviewer authorized to make its recommendation binding? We compare broad override authority with an evidence gate that permits replacement only after the reviewer produces a mechanically valid record of a binding-constraint violation and a compliant repair. Across two locally run open-weight models, 96 spatial-policy tasks, and a 96-task portfolio-transfer benchmark, the gate sharply reduces corruption of correct proposals while retaining most repairs of violations. The directions of this tradeoff are partly implied by the rule; its magnitude depends on reviewer transitions and upstream proposal states. A prospective validation then gives the reviewer an explicit choice to retain, replace, or escalate. This eliminates correct-proposal corruption for Qwen, but Mistral still replaces all 48 correct proposals; Qwen also declines every welfare-only repair that Mistral frequently attempts. Thus interface design changes reviewer behavior but is not a model-independent safeguard. The result is not that restricted review is universally better. It is that reviewer competence, action interface, and binding jurisdiction jointly determine both the correction domain and the corruption surface.
Comments: 11 pages, 3 figures, 3 tables. Code, frozen outputs, and reproduction instructions: this https URL
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
Cite as: arXiv:2611.05390 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2611.05390v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.05390
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Fuad Ali [view email] [v1] Sat, 12 Sep 2026 17:58:39 UTC (125 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Who May Overrule the Agent? Evidence-Gated Authority in LLM Review Institutions, by Fuad Ali
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Additional Features
Audio Summary
Current browse context:
cs.AI
new | recent | 2026-11
Change to browse by:
cs cs.MA
References & Citations
SciX
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)