Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Correct Robots Before They Make Mistakes: Proactive Human-in-the-Loop Intervention via Preference Learning

Summary

The paper introduces PHIL, a framework that lets operators preview a policy's predicted future motion through an XR interface and intervene before undesirable actions occur, pairing rejected predictions with corrective action chunks for preference-based post-training and substantially raising real-world manipulation success rates.

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Xinkai Jiang, Jing Jiang, Hongyi Zhou, Pankhuri Vanjani, Ahmad Baki, Jakub Suliga, Ge Li, Zhuoyue Li, Gerhard Neumann, Rudolf Lioutikov
Correct Robots Before They Make Mistakes: Proactive Human-in-the-Loop Intervention via Preference Learning
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 3 Nov 2026]

Title:Correct Robots Before They Make Mistakes: Proactive Human-in-the-Loop Intervention via Preference Learning

View a PDF of the paper titled Correct Robots Before They Make Mistakes: Proactive Human-in-the-Loop Intervention via Preference Learning, by Xinkai Jiang and 9 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:This paper presents Proactive Human-in-the-Loop (PHIL), a framework for proactive policy correction and preference-based post-training. PHIL enables operators to preview policy-predicted future motion and intervene before anticipated undesirable actions. During takeover, PHIL continues querying the policy and displaying its predicted trajectories in the physical workspace through an extended reality (XR) interface. PHIL pairs rejected policy predictions with corrective action chunks subsequently executed from the same physical state over the same horizon, and preference-based post-training encourages the policy to favor these corrections. This paper evaluates PHIL on four real-world manipulation tasks using a diffusion policy and a pretrained vision-language-action policy. With five correction episodes per condition, PHIL increases mean success rates across the evaluated tasks and demonstration budgets from 44.0% to 70.3% for the diffusion policy and from 57.8% to 76.9% for X-VLA, compared with HG-DAgger. Separately, policies trained with proactive corrections show fewer unnecessary recovery behaviors in successful episodes. Project page: this https URL.

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO)

Cite as: arXiv:2611.05667 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2611.05667v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.05667

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Xinkai Jiang [view email] [v1] Tue, 3 Nov 2026 21:54:27 UTC (9,657 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Correct Robots Before They Make Mistakes: Proactive Human-in-the-Loop Intervention via Preference Learning, by Xinkai Jiang and 9 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-11

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • PHIL lets operators preview predicted trajectories and take over before a bad action happens
  • An XR interface keeps displaying the policy's predicted trajectories in the physical workspace during takeover
  • Mean success rose from 44.0% to 70.3% for a diffusion policy and from 57.8% to 76.9% for X-VLA versus HG-DAgger
  • Policies trained with proactive corrections showed fewer unnecessary recovery behaviors in successful episodes

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.