Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Visual Forensic Detection of Fabricated Bangla News Photocards using Deep Learning

Summary

This study recasts photocard fake-news detection in Bangladesh as visual image forgery detection. It builds a dataset of 969 authentic and 1,077 fabricated Bangla photocards, augmented to 32,736 samples. A fully connected ANN achieves only ~52% accuracy, while a compact four-block CNN reaches 87.45% and a fine-tuned YOLOv8n-cls backbone reaches 97.36%, highlighting underfitting in the compact model.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Anindya Kundu, Kabya Mithun Saha, Md. Muhaiminul Islam, Fayek Ahmed, Aminul Kader Bulbul, Muhammad Ibrahim
Visual Forensic Detection of Fabricated Bangla News Photocards using Deep Learning
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 19 Oct 2026]

Title:Visual Forensic Detection of Fabricated Bangla News Photocards using Deep Learning

View a PDF of the paper titled Visual Forensic Detection of Fabricated Bangla News Photocards using Deep Learning, by Anindya Kundu and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:In Bangladesh, much localized misinformation spreads as photocards: single-image news summaries that imitate the branding of well-known news organizations. Because the misleading message lives in the pixels rather than in machine-readable text, text-based fact-checking tools cannot see it. We recast photocard fake-news detection as visual image forgery detection. We build a dataset of 969 authentic and 1,077 fabricated Bangla photocards scraped from public Facebook pages: authentic cards from the verified pages of seventeen national television broadcasters, fabricated ones from pseudo-broadcaster pages, anonymous profiles, and public groups. Sixteen photometric and morphological transformations per image grow the corpus to 32,736 samples. A fully connected ANN reaches only about 52% accuracy, its loss stuck at ln(2) ~ 0.693, showing that flattening the image destroys the spatial cues forgery detection needs. A compact, fully batch-normalized four-block CNN with 489,954 parameters, about 1,644x smaller than the ANN, is evaluated with leakage-free stratified group five-fold cross-validation, which keeps every augmented version of a card in one fold. Under this protocol the CNN reaches 87.45% +/- 0.53% pooled accuracy from scratch and 88.75% +/- 1.55% when its classifier head is warm-started from the ANN. An ImageNet-pretrained YOLOv8n-cls backbone (1.44M parameters) fine-tuned on the same folds reaches 97.36% +/- 0.42%, marking the headroom above the compact model. We report per-class precision, recall, F1, and pooled confusion matrices, diagnose and fix a one-class collapse caused by an unnormalized classifier head, and give a manual error analysis and bias-variance diagnosis showing that the compact CNNs under-fit.

Comments: 15 pages, 9 figures, 22 tables

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2611.05403 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2611.05403v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.05403

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Anindya Kundu [view email] [v1] Mon, 19 Oct 2026 19:14:13 UTC (5,680 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Visual Forensic Detection of Fabricated Bangla News Photocards using Deep Learning, by Anindya Kundu and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-11

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Creates the first dataset of fabricated Bangla news photocards: 969 authentic and 1,077 fabricated images, expanded to 32,736 samples via 16 transformations.
  • A fully connected ANN reaches only ~52% accuracy, with loss stuck at ln(2), showing that flattening images destroys spatial cues needed for forgery detection.
  • A compact four-block CNN (489,954 parameters) achieves 87.45% ± 0.53% pooled accuracy under leakage-free stratified group five-fold cross-validation.
  • An ImageNet-pretrained YOLOv8n-cls (1.44M parameters) fine-tuned on the same folds reaches 97.36% ± 0.42%, indicating significant headroom for the compact model.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.