Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

VisCurate: Evaluating Behavioral Equivalence of Visual Skills

Summary

arXiv:2610.30405v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern vision-based agents have shifted toward skill-based problem-solving, where a skill is an executable image-to-image operation, e.g., cropping, thresholding, or edge detection. As these skill libraries grow, they accumulate duplicated, mislabeled, and defective skills. The signals normally used to curate them (a skill's name, description, or source code) say little about how the skill visually changes the image. We present VisCurate, a framework and benchmark that curates visual skill libraries from observed execution rather than from text. VisCurate runs each candidate skill pair on a shared probe battery and assigns one of six behavioral relations, each tied to a library edit that is safe to make. The benchmark injects seven defect ty…

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Md Farhan Ishraq, Md Farhan Ishmam, Reaz Hassan Joarder, Md Hasanul Kabir
VisCurate: Evaluating Behavioral Equivalence of Visual Skills
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 21 Oct 2026]

Title:VisCurate: Evaluating Behavioral Equivalence of Visual Skills

View a PDF of the paper titled VisCurate: Evaluating Behavioral Equivalence of Visual Skills, by Md Farhan Ishraq and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Modern vision-based agents have shifted toward skill-based problem-solving, where a skill is an executable image-to-image operation, e.g., cropping, thresholding, or edge detection. As these skill libraries grow, they accumulate duplicated, mislabeled, and defective skills. The signals normally used to curate them (a skill's name, description, or source code) say little about how the skill visually changes the image. We present VisCurate, a framework and benchmark that curates visual skill libraries from observed execution rather than from text. VisCurate runs each candidate skill pair on a shared probe battery and assigns one of six behavioral relations, each tied to a library edit that is safe to make. The benchmark injects seven defect types into a clean library at controlled rates, producing 300 reproducible instances with ground-truth relations and repairs. While text baselines accept up to five of six false merges on hard negatives, our verifier accepts none and recovers 51.2% of the pairs that are truly mergeable. On two real, uncurated libraries, VisCurate finds that 92% of the skills a package shares with its downstream copy are redundant, while execution confirms only 10 of 17 published equivalence claims. The curation problem also remains open, as the strongest of the nine automated curators recovers only about half of the repairs. We emphasize that visual skill libraries should be curated by behavior, not by description.

Comments: Accepted at the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV 2027), Main Conference

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.30405 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.30405v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.30405

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Md. Farhan Ishraq [view email] [v1] Wed, 21 Oct 2026 20:11:08 UTC (173 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled VisCurate: Evaluating Behavioral Equivalence of Visual Skills, by Md Farhan Ishraq and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.30405v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern vision-based agents have shifted toward skill-based problem-solving, where a skill is an executable image-to-image operation…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.