Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

LAMB: Latent Multi-Hypothesis Beliefs for Long-Horizon Large Language Agents

Summary

arXiv:2610.26955v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon language agents require compact memories that retain interaction evidence while preserving competing hypotheses about unobserved states. Although effective, many belief-state methods encode memory in discrete natural language, where repeated compression can omit evidence or prematurely discard plausible alternatives. We introduce LAMB, a recurrent framework for latent multi-hypothesis beliefs. A Common--Delta factorization combines a shared Common state for interaction evidence with weighted Delta components for competing hypotheses. Relative evidence from action-outcome predictions guides recurrent hypothesis updates without generating textual memory. A context-conditioned readout exposes hypotheses separately to the policy thr…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Peien Ding, Hui Li, Yuhan Liu, Jinsong Su
LAMB: Latent Multi-Hypothesis Beliefs for Long-Horizon Large Language Agents
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 18 Oct 2026]

Title:LAMB: Latent Multi-Hypothesis Beliefs for Long-Horizon Large Language Agents

View a PDF of the paper titled LAMB: Latent Multi-Hypothesis Beliefs for Long-Horizon Large Language Agents, by Peien Ding and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Long-horizon language agents require compact memories that retain interaction evidence while preserving competing hypotheses about unobserved states. Although effective, many belief-state methods encode memory in discrete natural language, where repeated compression can omit evidence or prematurely discard plausible alternatives. We introduce LAMB, a recurrent framework for latent multi-hypothesis beliefs. A Common--Delta factorization combines a shared Common state for interaction evidence with weighted Delta components for competing hypotheses. Relative evidence from action-outcome predictions guides recurrent hypothesis updates without generating textual memory. A context-conditioned readout exposes hypotheses separately to the policy through a fixed-token belief prefix in the default configuration. The belief modules and policy are jointly trained using action imitation and auxiliary state, outcome, and observation-discrimination objectives. Across ALFWorld, BabyAI, ScienceWorld, and Crafter, LAMB matches or outperforms PABU, improving ALFWorld SR@30 and ScienceWorld success by 6.0 and 22.0 percentage points, respectively, and Crafter achievement progress by 26.37 points. On ALFWorld, it also reduces the redundant-action rate by 17.70 percentage points. These results support latent multi-hypothesis beliefs as compact memory for effective long-horizon decision making

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.26955 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.26955v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.26955

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Peien Ding [view email] [v1] Sun, 18 Oct 2026 10:41:04 UTC (1,349 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled LAMB: Latent Multi-Hypothesis Beliefs for Long-Horizon Large Language Agents, by Peien Ding and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.26955v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon language agents require compact memories that retain interaction evidence while preserving competing hypotheses about…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.