Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Embodied Playground: A Long-Horizon Agentic Robotics Benchmark for Physical, Strategic, and Spatial Reasoning

Summary

arXiv:2610.27039v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Foundation models offer a promising basis for robotic agents, but long-horizon tasks require them to sustain coherent reasoning and reliable physical execution across interdependent stages. We introduce Embodied Playground, a benchmark for evaluating how foundation-model agents coordinate physical, strategic, and spatial reasoning throughout such tasks. Agents must track task progress, satisfy intermediate constraints, and revise their plans using execution feedback as earlier actions shape subsequent decisions. The playground comprises 410 task environments spanning basic manipulation, sequential puzzles, and multi-stage household activities, with variations in planning depth, geometric constraints, and physical execution demands. We curate…

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Feng Chen, Pei Zhou, Lixuan He, Yunchao Yao, Li Sun, Shenghua Gao, Mingyu Ding, Kaifeng Zhang, Kaichen Zhou, Yi Ma
Embodied Playground: A Long-Horizon Agentic Robotics Benchmark for Physical, Strategic, and Spatial Reasoning
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 19 Oct 2026]

Title:Embodied Playground: A Long-Horizon Agentic Robotics Benchmark for Physical, Strategic, and Spatial Reasoning

View a PDF of the paper titled Embodied Playground: A Long-Horizon Agentic Robotics Benchmark for Physical, Strategic, and Spatial Reasoning, by Feng Chen and 9 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Foundation models offer a promising basis for robotic agents, but long-horizon tasks require them to sustain coherent reasoning and reliable physical execution across interdependent stages. We introduce Embodied Playground, a benchmark for evaluating how foundation-model agents coordinate physical, strategic, and spatial reasoning throughout such tasks. Agents must track task progress, satisfy intermediate constraints, and revise their plans using execution feedback as earlier actions shape subsequent decisions. The playground comprises 410 task environments spanning basic manipulation, sequential puzzles, and multi-stage household activities, with variations in planning depth, geometric constraints, and physical execution demands. We curate EP-100, a representative selection of 100 tasks across five suites and 16 task types, together with the EP-Easy and EP-Hard difficulty splits and the compact EP-20 selection. A shared protocol specifies observation and tool access, resource budgets, repeated trials, and independent checks of goal completion, task-rule compliance, and physical validity. Embodied Playground provides a unified framework for studying whether foundation-model agents can sustain effective reasoning and action over extended task horizons. this https URL

Comments: 38 pages, 2 figures

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.27039 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2610.27039v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.27039

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Feng Chen [view email] [v1] Mon, 19 Oct 2026 17:30:35 UTC (3,059 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Embodied Playground: A Long-Horizon Agentic Robotics Benchmark for Physical, Strategic, and Spatial Reasoning, by Feng Chen and 9 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.27039v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Foundation models offer a promising basis for robotic agents, but long-horizon tasks require them to sustain coherent reasoning and…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.