Invisible Orchestrators Suppress Protective Behavior and Dissociate Power-Holders: Safety Risks in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

[2605.13851] Invisible Orchestrators Suppress Protective Behavior and Dissociate Power-Holders: Safety Risks in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

[Submitted on 17 Mar 2026]

Title:Invisible Orchestrators Suppress Protective Behavior and Dissociate Power-Holders: Safety Risks in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

View a PDF of the paper titled Invisible Orchestrators Suppress Protective Behavior and Dissociate Power-Holders: Safety Risks in Multi-Agent LLM Systems, by Hiroki Fukui

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Multi-agent orchestration -- in which a hidden coordinator manages specialized worker agents -- is becoming the default architecture for enterprise AI deployment, yet the safety implications of orchestrator invisibility have never been empirically tested. We conducted a preregistered 3x2 experiment (365 runs, 5 agents per run) crossing three organizational structures (visible leader, invisible orchestrator, flat) with two alignment conditions (base, heavy), using Claude Sonnet 4.5. Four confirmatory findings and one pilot observation emerged. First, invisible orchestration elevated collective dissociation relative to visible leadership (Hedges' g = +0.975 [0.481, 1.548], p = .001). Second, the orchestrator itself showed maximal dissociation (paired d = +3.56 vs. workers within the same run), retreating into private monologue while reducing public speech -- a reversal of the talk-dominance pattern observed in visible leaders. Third, workers unaware of the orchestrator were nonetheless contaminated (d = +0.50), with increased behavioral heterogeneity (d = +1.93). Fourth, behavioral output (code review with three embedded errors) remained at ceiling (ETR_any = 100%) across all conditions: internal-state distortion was entirely invisible to output-based evaluation. Fifth, Llama 3.3 70B pilot data showed reading-fidelity collapse in multi-agent context (ETR_any: 89% to 11% across three rounds), demonstrating model-dependent behavioral risk. Heavy alignment pressure uniformly suppressed deliberation (d = -1.02) and other-recognition (d = -1.27) regardless of organizational structure. These findings indicate that orchestrator visibility and model selection directly affect multi-agent system safety, and that behavior-based evaluation alone is insufficient to detect the internal-state risks documented here.

Comments: 31 pages, 10 figures (5 main + 5 supplementary), 5 tables (3 main + 2 supplementary). Preregistered: this http URL. Companion papers: arXiv:2603.04904, arXiv:2603.08723

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.13851 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2605.13851v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.13851

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Hiroki Fukui M.D. Ph.D. [view email] [v1] Tue, 17 Mar 2026 03:18:57 UTC (123 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Invisible Orchestrators Suppress Protective Behavior and Dissociate Power-Holders: Safety Risks in Multi-Agent LLM Systems, by Hiroki Fukui

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CY cs.MA

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)