Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source3 min read

Effective Performance Measurement: Challenges and Opportunities in KPI Extraction from Earnings Calls

Summary

This paper explores the challenges of extracting Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) from unstructured earnings call transcripts. The authors evaluate SEC-trained models, introduce three new benchmarks (SECB, ECB, ECB-A), and find that encoder-based models struggle with domain shift. They propose an LLM-based system achieving 79.7% precision in human evaluation, providing a baseline for tracking emergent KPIs.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Rasmus T. Aavang, Rasmus Tjalk-B{\o}ggild, Alexandre Iolov, Giovanni Rizzi, Mike Zhang, Johannes Bjerva
Effective Performance Measurement: Challenges and Opportunities in KPI Extraction from Earnings Calls
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.03147] Effective Performance Measurement: Challenges and Opportunities in KPI Extraction from Earnings Calls

Skip to main content

Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.

We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate

> cs > arXiv:2605.03147

Help | Advanced Search

All fields Title Author Abstract Comments Journal reference ACM classification MSC classification Report number arXiv identifier DOI ORCID arXiv author ID Help pages Full text

Search

GO

quick links

Login

Help Pages

About

-->

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2605.03147 (cs)

[Submitted on 4 May 2026]

Title:Effective Performance Measurement: Challenges and Opportunities in KPI Extraction from Earnings Calls

Authors:Rasmus T. Aavang, Rasmus Tjalk-Bøggild, Alexandre Iolov, Giovanni Rizzi, Mike Zhang, Johannes Bjerva

View a PDF of the paper titled Effective Performance Measurement: Challenges and Opportunities in KPI Extraction from Earnings Calls, by Rasmus T. Aavang and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Earnings calls are a key source of financial information about public companies. However, extracting information from these calls is difficult. Unlike the templatic filings required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to report a company's financial situation, earnings conference calls have no built-in labels, are unstructured, and feature conversational language. We explore this challenging domain by assessing the information captured by models trained on SEC filings and in-context learning methods. To establish a baseline, we first evaluate the generalization capabilities of SEC-trained models across established SEC datasets. To support our investigation, we introduce three novel benchmarks: (1) SEC Filings Benchmark (SECB), (2) Earnings Calls Benchmark (ECB), and ECB-A, a subset with 2,460 expert annotation groups to support our qualitative analysis. We find that encoder-based models struggle with the domain shift. Finally, we propose a system utilizing LLMs to perform open-ended extraction from unstructured call transcripts, verified by human evaluation (79.7% precision), providing a baseline for this valuable domain through the consistent tracking of emergent KPIs.

Comments: Accepted to ACL Industry Track

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.03147 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.03147v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.03147

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Rasmus T. Aavang [view email] [v1] Mon, 4 May 2026 20:40:05 UTC (1,962 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Effective Performance Measurement: Challenges and Opportunities in KPI Extraction from Earnings Calls, by Rasmus T. Aavang and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

About

Help

contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact

subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe

Copyright

Privacy Policy

Web Accessibility Assistance

arXiv Operational Status

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Earnings calls are unstructured and lack labels, making KPI extraction difficult.
  • Three new benchmarks are introduced: SECB, ECB, and ECB-A with 2,460 expert annotations.
  • The proposed LLM-based system achieves 79.7% precision in open-ended KPI extraction.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.