Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

A Proxy-Based Method for Measuring Racial Disparities in Text-to-Image Generators

Summary

An arXiv paper introduces an automated auditing method that adapts racial proxy variables from U.S. antidiscrimination law to measure representational bias in text-to-image generators, testing Imagen 4 Fast, Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo, and Flux Schnell.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Nia Mucher, Ngan Pham, Jason Chin, Aaron Brown, David Evans
A Proxy-Based Method for Measuring Racial Disparities in Text-to-Image Generators
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 4 Nov 2026]

Title:A Proxy-Based Method for Measuring Racial Disparities in~Text-to-Image~Generators

View a PDF of the paper titled A Proxy-Based Method for Measuring Racial Disparities in~Text-to-Image~Generators, by Nia Mucher and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:We present an automated method for auditing text-to-image generators for representational bias against ground-truth demographic benchmarks. Our approach adapts the racial proxy variables used in U.S. antidiscrimination law to provide a fine-grained comparative analysis of variations in racial representation in generated images. We classify each generated image by race and then compare the model's distribution to publicly available demographic benchmark data to identify patterns of over- and under-representation. We also measure skin tone using CIELAB values and calculate cosine similarity amongst groups of images in order to capture biases that don't show up in demographic comparisons such as differences in image quality across races and skin tones. We report on experiments testing three models (Imagen 4 Fast, Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo, and Flux Schnell) using three categories of proxies (geographic, occupational, and surname) and 50 variants within each category. We find notable variation across the models as well as by proxy category. For example, Imagen 4 Fast overrepresents white classified images more than the other models tested and produces images with lighter, more homogeneous skin tones. Imagen 4 Fast also had the largest representational disparity for Black demographics among surname and geographical prompts. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo produces results that overall diverge most from census data but yield the most diverse range of skin tones. Our method yields a generalizable and legally-grounded auditing tool that surfaces detailed information about model outputs without relying on implicit normative definitions of fairness.

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2611.07132 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2611.07132v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.07132

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Journal reference: Proceedings of the Ninth AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, Vol. 9, No. 3 (2026), pp. 1846-1857

Submission history

From: Nia Mucher [view email] [v1] Wed, 4 Nov 2026 20:58:20 UTC (4,310 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled A Proxy-Based Method for Measuring Racial Disparities in~Text-to-Image~Generators, by Nia Mucher and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-11

Change to browse by:

cs cs.LG

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • The method classifies generated images by race and compares distributions to demographic benchmarks.
  • Skin tone is measured via CIELAB values and cosine similarity to capture quality biases beyond demographics.
  • Imagen 4 Fast overrepresents white images and produces lighter, more homogeneous skin tones.
  • Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo diverges most from census data but yields the most diverse skin tones.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.