Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Expanding the Quality-Coverage Frontier with Competitive Flow Matching

Summary

This paper introduces competition among predictions during flow matching training: multiple low-dimensional conditioning codes produce candidate velocities, and only the best-matching one receives loss, preventing mode averaging. It also enables auxiliary conditioning scaling as a new guidance method. On ImageNet-256, post-training with less than 3% of original compute substantially improves the quality-coverage frontier, reducing FD_r,6 from 19.22 to 5.91 at 67% recall on SiT.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Wenxuan Peng, Richard Zhang, Haitian Zheng, Jaskirat Singh, Tsai-Shien Chen, Eli Shechtman, Bharath Hariharan, Hadar Averbuch-Elor, Zongze Wu
Expanding the Quality-Coverage Frontier with Competitive Flow Matching
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 4 Nov 2026]

Title:Expanding the Quality-Coverage Frontier with Competitive Flow Matching

View a PDF of the paper titled Expanding the Quality-Coverage Frontier with Competitive Flow Matching, by Wenxuan Peng and 8 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Flow matching (FM) generators often face a quality-coverage tradeoff. Inference-time techniques such as classifier-free guidance raise quality, but at the cost of coverage. We hypothesize this limitation stems from a basic property of the objective: an intermediate noisy image could correspond to many clean images, yet the model can only predict a single velocity, at best averaging over the multiple possibilities. To mitigate this, we introduce competition among predictions during training. We achieve this by augmenting the predictor with a randomly drawn low-dimensional conditioning code $z$. For each training example, we sample $K$ values of $z$ to produce $K$ candidate velocities that compete to explain the target, and apply the loss only to the best-matching candidate. This winner-take-all objective allows different modes to shape different predictions, rather than being averaged into a single compromise. Furthermore, this term naturally enables a new form of guidance, auxiliary conditioning scaling, which complements traditional guidance methods. Together, these two guidance mechanisms show that our method substantially improves the quality-coverage frontier. We validate on ImageNet-256, using two different testbeds, SiT and RAEv2. Given less than 3% of the original SiT pretraining compute for post-training, at the 67% Recall point, our method reduces $\mathrm{FD}_{r,6}$ from 19.22 to 5.91. On RAEv2, at the 70% Recall point, it reduces $\mathrm{FD}_{r,6}$ from 16.83 to 3.18.

Comments: 40 pages, 24 figures. Project page: this https URL

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2611.07055 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2611.07055v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.07055

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Wenxuan Peng [view email] [v1] Wed, 4 Nov 2026 19:16:10 UTC (46,731 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Expanding the Quality-Coverage Frontier with Competitive Flow Matching, by Wenxuan Peng and 8 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-11

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Proposes competitive flow matching with a winner-take-all objective to let different modes shape distinct predictions instead of averaging.
  • Introduces auxiliary conditioning scaling, a new guidance form complementary to classifier-free guidance.
  • Validated on SiT and RAEv2 with under 3% pretraining compute, cutting FD_r,6 from 19.22 to 5.91 at 67% recall.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.

Expanding the Quality-Coverage Frontier with Competitive Flow Matching | AI News Hub