[Submitted on 4 Nov 2026]
Title:Autonomous AI Agents Systematically Diverge From Human Preferences in Proof Formalization
View a PDF of the paper titled Autonomous AI Agents Systematically Diverge From Human Preferences in Proof Formalization, by B\'alint Gyevn\'ar and Simon DeDeo
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have ushered in a new age of proof abundance, but helping humans understand these proofs requires new attention to the differences in how AI agents and humans pursue a proof-making task. We present "simulated collaboration", a methodology that allows us to examine two key questions: (1) the relative attention AI agents pay to surface syntax or, conversely, deeper underlying semantics, and (2) how and where AI agent preferences for what to do next diverge from human preferences. On a set of nine major human collaborations in Lean with 4.7M definitions across more than 6K commits, we find that, over the course of proof construction, AI agents (1) are far more strongly drawn than humans to explicitly marked gaps; (2) show a relative aversion to densely connected proof centers and to complex or surprising proof goals; and (3) are relatively attracted to surprising proof bodies, which they tend to regularize toward baseline. Our results highlight important blind spots and potential interventions for future human-AI collaboration in mathematics.
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
Cite as: arXiv:2611.06995 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2611.06995v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.06995
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Bálint Gyevnár [view email] [v1] Wed, 4 Nov 2026 18:34:25 UTC (388 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Autonomous AI Agents Systematically Diverge From Human Preferences in Proof Formalization, by B\'alint Gyevn\'ar and Simon DeDeo
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Additional Features
Audio Summary
Current browse context:
cs.AI
new | recent | 2026-11
Change to browse by:
cs cs.HC
References & Citations
SciX
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)