Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

AIPO: Learning to Reason from Active Interaction

Summary

AIPO is an enhanced reinforcement learning framework that improves LLM reasoning by enabling the policy model to proactively consult three collaborative agents (Verify, Knowledge, and Reasoning) during exploration, expanding its capability boundary. Experiments show consistent gains on AIME, MATH500, GPQA-Diamond, and LiveCodeBench.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Junnan Liu, Linhao Luo, Thuy-Trang Vu, Gholamreza Haffari
AIPO: Learning to Reason from Active Interaction
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.08401] AIPO: : Learning to Reason from Active Interaction

[Submitted on 8 May 2026]

Title:AIPO: : Learning to Reason from Active Interaction

View a PDF of the paper titled AIPO: : Learning to Reason from Active Interaction, by Junnan Liu and 2 other authors

View PDF

Abstract:Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities, largely stimulated by Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR). However, existing RL algorithms face a fundamental limitation: their exploration remains largely constrained by the inherent capability boundary of the policy model. Although recent methods introduce external expert demonstrations to extend this boundary, they typically rely on complete trajectory-level guidance, which is sample-inefficient, information-sparse, and may confine exploration to a static guidance space. Inspired by the potential of multi-agent systems, we propose $\textbf{AIPO}$, an enhanced reinforcement learning framework that improves LLM reasoning through active multi-agent interaction during exploration. Specifically, AIPO enables the policy model to proactively consult three functional collaborative agents, $\textit{Verify Agent}$, $\textit{Knowledge Agent}$, and $\textit{Reasoning Agent}$, when encountering reasoning bottlenecks, thereby receiving fine-grained and targeted guidance to actively expand its capability boundary during training. We further introduce a tailored importance sampling coefficient together with a clipping strategy to mitigate the off-policy bias and gradient vanishing issues that arise when learning from agent-provided feedback. After training, the policy model performs reasoning independently without relying on collaborative agents. Extensive experiments on diverse reasoning benchmarks, including AIME, MATH500, GPQA-Diamond, and LiveCodeBench, show that AIPO consistently improves reasoning performance, generalizes robustly across different policy models and RLVR algorithms, and effectively expands the reasoning capability boundary of the policy model.

Comments: Preprint

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.08401 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.08401v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.08401

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Junnan Liu [view email] [v1] Fri, 8 May 2026 19:06:55 UTC (1,405 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled AIPO: : Learning to Reason from Active Interaction, by Junnan Liu and 2 other authors

View PDF

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersIntermediate

Key points

  • AIPO allows LLMs to actively query three specialist agents to overcome reasoning bottlenecks during training.
  • A tailored importance sampling coefficient and clipping strategy mitigate off-policy bias and gradient vanishing.
  • After training, the policy model reasons independently without agents.
  • Outperforms baselines across diverse benchmarks with strong generalization.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.