Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Adapting the Process of Adaptation: Darwinian, Lamarckian, and Agent-Directed Evolution in AI

Summary

arXiv paper proposes a theoretical framework comparing Darwinian, Lamarckian, and agent-directed evolution after environmental change. When learning is sufficiently effective, these mechanisms show progressively faster adaptation. But self-directed improvement does not ensure correct evaluation targets; misspecified objectives can accelerate convergence to wrong behavior, posing AI safety challenges.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Andrew W. Lo, Chaoyi Zhao
Adapting the Process of Adaptation: Darwinian, Lamarckian, and Agent-Directed Evolution in AI
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 4 Nov 2026]

Title:Adapting the Process of Adaptation: Darwinian, Lamarckian, and Agent-Directed Evolution in AI

View a PDF of the paper titled Adapting the Process of Adaptation: Darwinian, Lamarckian, and Agent-Directed Evolution in AI, by Andrew W. Lo and Chaoyi Zhao

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Evolution has shaped intelligence for billions of years. Artificial intelligence (AI) now raises a striking possibility: intelligence may begin to direct its own evolution. As AI agents become capable of modifying and evaluating their own behavior, how quickly could they improve, and how can that improvement remain safe? We develop a theoretical framework comparing Darwinian, Lamarckian, and agent-directed evolution following environmental change. Darwinian evolution relies on natural selection, Lamarckian evolution adds inherited learning, and agent-directed evolution allows agents to generate and evaluate behavioral variants and choose how extensively to search. When learning is sufficiently effective, these mechanisms exhibit progressively faster adaptation. Generating more variants accelerates adaptation, while optimal search effort depends on learning ability, problem difficulty, and experimentation costs. However, an agent's ability to direct its improvement does not ensure that improvements are evaluated against the intended objective. When the evaluation target is misspecified, additional search accelerates convergence toward the wrong behavior, even as measured performance improves. In recursive self-improvement, such errors may persist across generations, posing challenges for AI safety. Independent evaluation and oversight must keep pace with autonomous AI development. The central challenge is not simply to accelerate the evolution of intelligence, but to preserve humanity's ability to guide its direction, limit its speed, and intervene when necessary.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2611.07048 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2611.07048v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.07048

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Andrew Lo [view email] [v1] Wed, 4 Nov 2026 19:08:46 UTC (122 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Adapting the Process of Adaptation: Darwinian, Lamarckian, and Agent-Directed Evolution in AI, by Andrew W. Lo and Chaoyi Zhao

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-11

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • The framework distinguishes three evolutionary mechanisms: Darwinian (natural selection), Lamarckian (adds inherited learning), and agent-directed (agents generate and evaluate behavioral variants and choose search effort).
  • When learning is sufficiently effective, the mechanisms exhibit progressively faster adaptation; generating more variants accelerates adaptation, while optimal search effort depends on learning ability, problem difficulty, and experimentation costs.
  • A key risk of agent-directed improvement is evaluation target misspecification: additional search can accelerate convergence to wrong behavior even as measured performance improves, and errors may persist across generations in recursive self-improvement.
  • Independent evaluation and oversight must keep pace with autonomous AI development; the central challenge is preserving humanity's ability to guide direction, limit speed, and intervene when necessary.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.

Adapting the Process of Adaptation: Darwinian, Lamarckian, and Agent-Directed Evolution in AI | AI News Hub