跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全3 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:Wieszcz-XIX: A 3.1-Billion-Word Corpus of Pre-1918 Polish and Temporally Bounded Language Models Trained From Scratch

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2610.10592v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Historical Polish is well documented as a language but annotated in machine-readable form only to about a million words for the period this paper covers; the rest sits behind optical character recognition of variable quality. We present Wieszcz-XIX, a corpus of 6.75 billion tokens (about 3.1 billion words) in 294,369 documents, most of them periodical issues, of Polish published from 1800 to 1918, assembled from Wolne Lektury and the Internet Archive by a pipeline that filters, deduplicates, audits for post-1918 leakage and splits at the document level. It is over three orders of magnitude larger than the annotated corpus of the same period, and we quantify its defects: recognition corruption against a false-posit…

來源arXiv Computational Linguistics作者: Szymon Kocur
待翻譯:Wieszcz-XIX: A 3.1-Billion-Word Corpus of Pre-1918 Polish and Temporally Bounded Language Models Trained From Scratch
報告錯誤

更正渠道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 6 Oct 2026] Title:Wieszcz-XIX: A 3.1-Billion-Word Corpus of Pre-1918 Polish and Temporally Bounded Language Models Trained From Scratch View a PDF of the paper titled Wieszcz-XIX: A 3.1-Billion-Word Corpus of Pre-1918 Polish and Temporally Bounded Language Models Trained From Scratch, by Szymon Kocur View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Historical Polish is well documented as a language but annotated in machine-readable form only to about a million words for the period this paper covers; the rest sits behind optical character recognition of variable quality. We present Wieszcz-XIX, a corpus of 6.75 billion tokens (about 3.1 billion words) in 294,369 documents, most of them periodical issues, of Polish published from 1800 to 1918, assembled from Wolne Lektury and the Internet Archive by a pipeline that filters, deduplicates, audits for post-1918 leakage and splits at the document level. It is over three orders of magnitude larger than the annotated corpus of the same period, and we quantify its defects: recognition corruption against a false-positive floor, near-identical duplication, which is removed, and post-1918 leakage, which is excluded from the training corpus itself down to a known residue of 0.04 to 0.38% of its bytes, found in the transcribed source, so the published corpus is the trained one document for document. On a hand-corrected sample the character error rate is 0.68% where the text is legible, and 45% of the sampled passages cannot be corrected. On it we train a ladder of decoder-only models from 47M to 349M parameters from scratch, and measure their temporal boundedness. Against two modern Polish base models, one far larger, the 349M shows a crossover, as does the 107M against the comparator of its size: post-1918 vocabulary costs them about 3.1 bits per byte more than period vocabulary, a gap the comparators do not show, and period vocabulary costs them fewer bits than it costs the comparators. Shown period text, the models keep its spelling and the comparators only partly. Adding parameters gains about twice as much as a second pass over the data. We release the corpus, code and weights. Content warning: the models reproduce period prejudice, including antisemitic statements. Comments: 35 pages, 2 figures, 11 tables. Corpus: this https URL ; code: this https URL ; weights: this https URL Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Digital Libraries (cs.DL) ACM classes: I.2.7; H.3.7 Cite as: arXiv:2610.10592 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2610.10592v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.10592 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Szymon Kocur [view email] [v1] Tue, 6 Oct 2026 18:35:26 UTC (181 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Wieszcz-XIX: A 3.1-Billion-Word Corpus of Pre-1918 Polish and Temporally Bounded Language Models Trained From Scratch, by Szymon Kocur View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs cs.DL References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

工程師進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級元數據。
  • arXiv:2610.10592v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Historical Polish is well documented as a language but annotated in machine-readable form only to about a million words for the per…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。