When Retrieval Doesn't Help: A Large-Scale Study of Biomedical RAG
A large-scale study finds that retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) yields only small and inconsistent improvements (1-2 points) over no-retrieval baselines in biomedical QA. The backbone model matters far more than retriever or corpus choice, and expert vs. layman sources perform similarly.
[2606.04127] When Retrieval Doesn't Help: A Large-Scale Study of Biomedical RAG
[Submitted on 2 Jun 2026]
Title:When Retrieval Doesn't Help: A Large-Scale Study of Biomedical RAG
View a PDF of the paper titled When Retrieval Doesn't Help: A Large-Scale Study of Biomedical RAG, by Erfan Nourbakhsh and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Medical question answering is a high-stakes setting where factual errors can have serious consequences. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is widely viewed as a promising solution, and prior work has reported substantial gains for large medical QA models. We revisit this assumption across a broad range of open-weight instruction-tuned models spanning 7B to 72B parameters. Across five models, ten biomedical QA datasets, four retrieval methods, and four retrieval corpora, we find that retrieval yields only small and inconsistent improvements over a no-retrieval baseline, typically within 1-2 points. In contrast, the choice of backbone model has a much larger effect than the choice of retriever or corpus, and expert and layman retrieval sources perform similarly in most settings. These results suggest that the main bottleneck is not retrieval quality alone, but the model's limited ability to use retrieved evidence effectively.
Comments: 9 Pages, accepted to BioNLP Workshop at ACL 2026
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.04127 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2606.04127v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04127
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Anthony Rios [view email] [v1] Tue, 2 Jun 2026 18:34:54 UTC (14,450 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled When Retrieval Doesn't Help: A Large-Scale Study of Biomedical RAG, by Erfan Nourbakhsh and 2 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)