本文にスキップ
AI News HubLIVE
原典の内容 · 翻訳・分析待ち2 分で読了

翻訳待ち:What Users Think of Generative AI: A Cross-Platform NLP Analysis of Trust and Friction in App Store Reviews

記事の要約

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要:arXiv:2609.19151v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative AI (GenAI) applications have achieved rapid consumer adoption, yet little large-scale research examines user-perceived quality, trust, and adoption barriers. We present one of the first cross-application analyses of app store reviews for six major GenAI applications (ChatGPT, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Claude, DeepSeek, and Perplexity), comprising 17,012 English-language reviews from Google Play and the Apple App Store. We combine BERTopic topic modeling with RoBERTa sentiment classification and evaluate cross-application differences using chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, and multinomial logistic regression with Bonferroni correction. Both components are validated against human coding using a str…

ソースarXiv Computational Linguistics著者: Md Jafrin Hossain, Umme Nusrat Jahan, Shouvaggo Sharif Shammo
翻訳待ち:What Users Think of Generative AI: A Cross-Platform NLP Analysis of Trust and Friction in App Store Reviews
誤りを報告

訂正窓口はまだ利用できません。記事情報をコピーして保存できます。

訂正案内
本文へ

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。

[Submitted on 20 Jul 2026] Title:What Users Think of Generative AI: A Cross-Platform NLP Analysis of Trust and Friction in App Store Reviews View a PDF of the paper titled What Users Think of Generative AI: A Cross-Platform NLP Analysis of Trust and Friction in App Store Reviews, by Md Jafrin Hossain and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Generative AI (GenAI) applications have achieved rapid consumer adoption, yet little large-scale research examines user-perceived quality, trust, and adoption barriers. We present one of the first cross-application analyses of app store reviews for six major GenAI applications (ChatGPT, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Claude, DeepSeek, and Perplexity), comprising 17,012 English-language reviews from Google Play and the Apple App Store. We combine BERTopic topic modeling with RoBERTa sentiment classification and evaluate cross-application differences using chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, and multinomial logistic regression with Bonferroni correction. Both components are validated against human coding using a stratified sample of 300 reviews. Results show that negative sentiment concentrates in advertising (91%), authentication (89%), server reliability (83%), and subscription pricing (73%). Sentiment differs significantly across applications, with Claude exhibiting the highest negative sentiment (47.7%) alongside a strongly enthusiastic user base, indicating statistically significant polarization. These findings are robust despite unequal review counts across applications. As exploratory observations, a subset of DeepSeek reviews raised geopolitical and data privacy concerns related to its Chinese origin, while a proposed Trust Friction Score summarizes application-specific trust and usability barriers into interpretable dimensions. The study provides validated and actionable evidence on user trust, usability, and adoption barriers in consumer generative AI applications. Comments: Submitted to Array (Elsevier); currently under peer review Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Information Retrieval (cs.IR) Cite as: arXiv:2609.19151 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.19151v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.19151 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Md Jafrin Hossain [view email] [v1] Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:06:10 UTC (4,166 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled What Users Think of Generative AI: A Cross-Platform NLP Analysis of Trust and Friction in App Store Reviews, by Md Jafrin Hossain and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.HC cs.IR References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

要点と分析を開く

記事インテリジェンス

投資家上級

要点

  • AI 生成が一時的に利用できないため、ソース内容とフォールバックメタデータを保存しました。
  • arXiv:2609.19151v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative AI (GenAI) applications have achieved rapid consumer adoption, yet little large-scale research examines user-perceived q…

要点と分析は自動生成され、誤りを含む場合があります。原典をご確認ください。