Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

WATCH: Wide-Area Archaeological Site Tracking for Change Detection

Summary

WATCH is a framework for month-level change-event localization on PlanetScope satellite mosaics (2017-2024, 4.7 m/px) supporting three complementary scoring approaches: Temporal Embedding Distance (TED), Self-Supervised Change Detection (SSCD), and Weakly Supervised (WS) temporal localization. Benchmarked on 1,943 archaeological sites in Afghanistan, unsupervised methods (TED, SSCD) consistently outperform WS. TED with SatMAE achieves 55% exact-month recall, while TED with GeoRSCLIP, CLIP, or Satlas-Pretrain reaches 92.5% within a three-month tolerance. Directional margin analysis reveals temporal biases: SSCD offers early warning, while TED favors confirmation-oriented detection.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Girmaw Abebe Tadesse, Titien Bartette, Andrew Hassanali, Allen Kim, Jonathan Chemla, Andrew Zolli, Yves Ubelmann, Caleb Robinson, Inbal Becker-Reshef, Juan Lavista Ferres
WATCH: Wide-Area Archaeological Site Tracking for Change Detection
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.08160] WATCH: Wide-Area Archaeological Site Tracking for Change Detection

[Submitted on 4 May 2026]

Title:WATCH: Wide-Area Archaeological Site Tracking for Change Detection

View a PDF of the paper titled WATCH: Wide-Area Archaeological Site Tracking for Change Detection, by Girmaw Abebe Tadesse and 9 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Monitoring archaeological sites at scale is vital for protecting cultural heritage, yet pinpointing when disturbances occur remains difficult because visual cues are subtle and ground-truth data are sparse. We introduce WATCH, a framework for month-level change-event localization over PlanetScope satellite mosaics (2017-2024, 4.7 m/px) that supports three complementary scoring approaches: (i) Temporal Embedding Distance (TED), a training-free method that scores month-to-month deviations from a local temporal reference; (ii) Self-Supervised Change Detection (SSCD), an ensemble of reconstruction, forecasting, and latent-novelty signals; and (iii) a Weakly Supervised (WS) temporal localization model trained with sparse event-month labels. We benchmark WATCH on 1,943 archaeological sites in Afghanistan using embeddings from six foundation models (CLIP, GeoRSCLIP, SatMAE, Prithvi-EO-2.0, DINOv3, and Satlas-Pretrain) alongside a handcrafted spectral and texture baseline, and assess cross-regional generalization on sites in Syria, Turkey, Pakistan, and Egypt. The unsupervised approaches (TED, SSCD) consistently outperform the weakly supervised alternative. TED with SatMAE achieves the highest exact-month recall (55% at m=0), while TED with GeoRSCLIP, CLIP, or Satlas-Pretrain reaches 92.5% within a three-month tolerance (m=3). Handcrafted features remain competitive for exact-month detection under weak supervision. Our directional margin analysis reveals systematic temporal biases: SSCD paired with GeoRSCLIP or Prithvi-EO-2.0 exhibits the strongest early-warning profile, detecting anomalies before the recorded event, while TED favors confirmation-oriented detection after a change has materialized. These results show that satellite imagery combined with foundation-model embeddings enables scalable, decision-relevant heritage monitoring. Code: this https URL

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.08160 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2605.08160v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.08160

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Girmaw Abebe Tadesse [view email] [v1] Mon, 4 May 2026 12:35:59 UTC (11,004 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled WATCH: Wide-Area Archaeological Site Tracking for Change Detection, by Girmaw Abebe Tadesse and 9 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • WATCH framework enables scalable month-level change detection for archaeological sites using satellite imagery and foundation model embeddings.
  • Unsupervised methods (TED and SSCD) outperform weakly supervised alternatives in both exact and tolerant detection.
  • TED achieves 92.5% recall within three months using certain embeddings, while SSCD provides early warning capabilities.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.