Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source3 min read

Visual Chart Representations for Cryptocurrency Regime Prediction: A Systematic Deep Learning Study

Summary

This paper systematically compares different visual representations for cryptocurrency regime prediction, evaluating three image encoding methods, five chart component configurations, four neural network architectures, and the impact of transfer learning. Results show a simple 4-layer CNN on raw candlestick charts achieves 0.892 AUC-ROC, outperforming larger pretrained models, and simpler representations consistently outperform complex alternatives. Transfer learning improves performance by 4–16% despite domain gap.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Dustin M. Haggett
Visual Chart Representations for Cryptocurrency Regime Prediction: A Systematic Deep Learning Study
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.00875] Visual Chart Representations for Cryptocurrency Regime Prediction: A Systematic Deep Learning Study

Skip to main content

Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.

We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate

> cs > arXiv:2605.00875

Help | Advanced Search

All fields Title Author Abstract Comments Journal reference ACM classification MSC classification Report number arXiv identifier DOI ORCID arXiv author ID Help pages Full text

Search

GO

quick links

Login

Help Pages

About

-->

Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

arXiv:2605.00875 (cs)

[Submitted on 25 Apr 2026]

Title:Visual Chart Representations for Cryptocurrency Regime Prediction: A Systematic Deep Learning Study

Authors:Dustin M. Haggett

View a PDF of the paper titled Visual Chart Representations for Cryptocurrency Regime Prediction: A Systematic Deep Learning Study, by Dustin M. Haggett

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Technical traders have long relied on visual analysis of candlestick charts to identify market patterns and predict price movements. While deep learning has achieved remarkable success in image classification, its application to financial chart images remains underexplored. This paper presents a systematic study comparing different visual representations for cryptocurrency regime prediction. We evaluate three image encoding methods (raw candlestick charts, Gramian Angular Fields, and multi-channel GAF), five chart component configurations, four neural network architectures (CNN, ResNet18, EfficientNet-B0, and Vision Transformer), and the impact of ImageNet transfer learning. Through eight controlled experiments on Bitcoin, Ethereum, and S&P 500 data spanning 2018-2024, we identify optimal configurations for visual regime classification. Our results show that a simple 4-layer CNN on raw candlestick charts achieves 0.892 AUC-ROC, outperforming larger pretrained models. Surprisingly, simpler representations (price-only charts, 128x128 resolution) consistently outperform more complex alternatives. We provide interpretability analysis using GradCAM and demonstrate that transfer learning improves performance by 4-16% despite the domain gap between natural images and financial charts.

Comments: 9 pages, 8 figures, 9 tables. Stevens Institute of Technology course project, Fall 2025

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.00875 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2605.00875v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.00875

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Dustin Haggett [view email] [v1] Sat, 25 Apr 2026 04:32:30 UTC (1,629 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Visual Chart Representations for Cryptocurrency Regime Prediction: A Systematic Deep Learning Study, by Dustin M. Haggett

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

About

Help

contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact

subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe

Copyright

Privacy Policy

Web Accessibility Assistance

arXiv Operational Status

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Systematic comparison of three encoding methods, five chart configurations, four architectures, and transfer learning
  • Simple 4-layer CNN on raw candlestick charts achieves 0.892 AUC-ROC, surpassing larger pretrained models
  • Simpler representations (price-only charts, 128x128 resolution) consistently outperform complex ones
  • Transfer learning still yields 4–16% improvement despite domain gap between natural images and financial charts

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.