Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

VERGE: Verification-Enhanced Refinement for Grounded Extraction of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Symptoms in Clinical Notes

Summary

Early-onset colorectal cancer is increasing among younger adults, yet red-flag symptoms in this age group lack evidence-based guidelines for follow-up testing, and structured encounter data miss key details such as symptom duration, context, and family history. Researchers developed VERGE, an agentic workflow that combines retrieval-augmented generation with a bounded verification-refinement cycle to extract six red-flag symptoms and family-history risk status from free-text clinical notes. On 4,033 clinician-labeled note-finding pairs, VERGE improved precision from 0.764 to 0.849 and MCC from 0.681 to 0.730 while requiring human review for only 1.5% of claims.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Nikkie Hooman, Monarch Nigam, Amy E. Hughes, Rasmi G. Nair, Mehak Gupta
VERGE: Verification-Enhanced Refinement for Grounded Extraction of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Symptoms in Clinical Notes
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 3 Sep 2026]

Title:VERGE: Verification-Enhanced Refinement for Grounded Extraction of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Symptoms in Clinical Notes

View a PDF of the paper titled VERGE: Verification-Enhanced Refinement for Grounded Extraction of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Symptoms in Clinical Notes, by Nikkie Hooman and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Early-onset colorectal cancer is increasing among younger adults, yet red-flag symptoms in this age group have no evidence-based guidelines for follow-up testing, and structured encounter data do not capture the detail needed to support early detection and inform follow-up, including symptom duration, context, and fam- ily history, an established colorectal-cancer risk factor. This study aimed to develop and evaluate an automated method for extracting six red-flag symptoms and family-history risk status from free-text clinical notes. We developed VERGE, an agentic workflow in which an initial label and evidence are proposed using retrieval-augmented generation, then passed through a bounded verification- refinement cycle that checks textual grounding and clinical validity, corrects and rechecks a claim until resolved or a limit is reached, and escalates unresolved claims for human review. VERGE was evaluated on 4,033 clinician-labeled note-finding pairs against a single-agent baseline, a rule-based clinical language-processing baseline, and an alternative underlying language model. Compared with the single-agent baseline, VERGE reduced false positive find- ings, improving precision from 0.764 to 0.849 and MCC from 0.681 to 0.730, a balanced gain across the precision-recall trade-off, and resolved most flagged errors autonomously, with human review required for only 1.5 percent of claims. These results indicate that a bounded, verification-based workflow can reduce unnecessary positive findings without sacrificing the ability to detect true ones. This approach offers a path toward more reliable and trustworthy clinical language-processing tools to support colorectal cancer risk assessment in younger patients.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.04366 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.04366v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.04366

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Nikkie Hooman [view email] [v1] Thu, 3 Sep 2026 18:25:50 UTC (1,509 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled VERGE: Verification-Enhanced Refinement for Grounded Extraction of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Symptoms in Clinical Notes, by Nikkie Hooman and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Early-onset colorectal cancer is rising in younger adults, but red-flag symptoms in this group lack evidence-based follow-up guidance and structured data are insufficient for early detection.
  • VERGE is an agentic workflow that uses retrieval-augmented generation and a bounded verification-refinement loop to check textual grounding and clinical validity.
  • In 4,033 clinician-labeled samples, VERGE raised precision to 0.849 and MCC to 0.730.
  • Only 1.5% of claims required human review, showing reduced false positives without sacrificing true-positive detection.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.