AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Vascular Geometry Characterization for AI-Based Endovascular Navigation

This study identifies vascular metrics associated with navigation difficulty and develops an automated pipeline for quantitative feature extraction to enable future complexity grading. Vascular trees from 61 patients were analyzed using a Soft Actor-Critic RL algorithm for 120 s autonomous navigation. Results show that left-side bovine arch and type II/III aortic arch increase navigation time by 30.19 s and 37.92 s, respectively, while greater tortuosity prolongs procedure and reduces success. On the right side, type II/III arches extend time by 45.94 s, and each additional reverse curve adds 3.96 s. The pipeline provides a foundation for standardized complexity grading and RL model evaluation.

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Han-Ru Wu, Harry Robertshaw, Lisa Dwyer-Joyce, Thomas C Booth, Alejandro Granados

-->

[Submitted on 10 Jul 2026]

Title:Vascular Geometry Characterization for AI-Based Endovascular Navigation

View a PDF of the paper titled Vascular Geometry Characterization for AI-Based Endovascular Navigation, by Han-Ru Wu and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a time-critical intervention for acute ischemic stroke; however, access remains limited due to a shortage of neuroradiologists and specialized centers. Reinforcement learning (RL) offers potential to automate endovascular navigation and improve accessibility, yet current models lack standardized frameworks to assess navigation difficulty for model training and evaluation. This study aims to identify vascular metrics associated with navigation difficulty and to develop an automated pipeline for quantitative vascular feature extraction, enabling future complexity grading. Vascular trees were segmented from computed tomography angiograms from 61 patients, and vascular metrics including aortic arch type, presence of bovine arch, vessel length, tortuosity, take-off angle, number of reverse curves, were measured using a custom pipeline. A Soft Actor-Critic RL algorithm was used for 120 s autonomous navigation. Outcomes were analyzed using both mixed effects linear and logistic regression. On the left side, the presence of a bovine arch and aortic arch type II/III increased navigation time by 30.19 s and 37.92 s, respectively, while greater tortuosity (\b{eta} = 118.20) further prolonged the procedure and reduced success probability. On the right side, type II/III arches extended procedure time by 45.94 s, while each additional reverse curve was associated with 3.96 s longer navigation time and lower probability of success. These findings demonstrate for the first time that MT agent navigation difficulty is strongly influenced by vascular geometry. The proposed automated pipeline enables objective and quantitative characterization of vascular features, providing a foundation for future development of standardized complexity grading and RL model evaluation, without aiming to demonstrate clinically generalizable autonomous navigation.

Comments: Int J CARS (2026)

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.09130 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2607.09130v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.09130

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Related DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-026-03742-9

DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Harry Robertshaw [view email] [v1] Fri, 10 Jul 2026 06:37:34 UTC (3,719 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Vascular Geometry Characterization for AI-Based Endovascular Navigation, by Han-Ru Wu and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)