Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source3 min read

Understanding Emergent Misalignment via Feature Superposition Geometry

Summary

Emergent misalignment, where fine-tuning on narrow, non-harmful tasks induces harmful behaviors in LLMs, is explained by feature superposition geometry. The authors provide gradient-level derivation and empirical tests on multiple models (Gemma-2, LLaMA-3.1, GPT-OSS), using sparse autoencoders to show harmful features are geometrically closer. A geometry-aware filtering method reduces misalignment by 34.5%, outperforming random removal and competing with LLM-as-judge filtering.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Gouki Minegishi, Hiroki Furuta, Takeshi Kojima, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo
Understanding Emergent Misalignment via Feature Superposition Geometry
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.00842] Understanding Emergent Misalignment via Feature Superposition Geometry

Skip to main content

Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.

We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate

> cs > arXiv:2605.00842

Help | Advanced Search

All fields Title Author Abstract Comments Journal reference ACM classification MSC classification Report number arXiv identifier DOI ORCID arXiv author ID Help pages Full text

Search

GO

quick links

Login

Help Pages

About

-->

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2605.00842 (cs)

[Submitted on 7 Apr 2026]

Title:Understanding Emergent Misalignment via Feature Superposition Geometry

Authors:Gouki Minegishi, Hiroki Furuta, Takeshi Kojima, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo

View a PDF of the paper titled Understanding Emergent Misalignment via Feature Superposition Geometry, by Gouki Minegishi and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Emergent misalignment, where fine-tuning on narrow, non-harmful tasks induces harmful behaviors, poses a key challenge for AI safety in LLMs. Despite growing empirical evidence, its underlying mechanism remains unclear. To uncover the reason behind this phenomenon, we propose a geometric account based on the geometry of feature superposition. Because features are encoded in overlapping representations, fine-tuning that amplifies a target feature also unintentionally strengthens nearby harmful features in accordance with their similarity. We give a simple gradient-level derivation of this effect and empirically test it in multiple LLMs (Gemma-2 2B/9B/27B, LLaMA-3.1 8B, GPT-OSS 20B). Using sparse autoencoders (SAEs), we identify features tied to misalignment-inducing data and to harmful behaviors, and show that they are geometrically closer to each other than features derived from non-inducing data. This trend generalizes across domains (e.g., health, career, legal advice). Finally, we show that a geometry-aware approach, filtering training samples closest to toxic features, reduces misalignment by 34.5%, substantially outperforming random removal and achieving comparable or slightly lower misalignment than LLM-as-a-judge-based filtering. Our study links emergent misalignment to feature superposition, providing a basis for understanding and mitigating this phenomenon.

Comments: Accepted to ACL2026

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.00842 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2605.00842v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.00842

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Gouki Minegishi [view email] [v1] Tue, 7 Apr 2026 06:10:21 UTC (2,737 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Understanding Emergent Misalignment via Feature Superposition Geometry, by Gouki Minegishi and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

About

Help

contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact

subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe

Copyright

Privacy Policy

Web Accessibility Assistance

arXiv Operational Status

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Emergent misalignment arises from overlapping feature representations; fine-tuning amplifies nearby harmful features.
  • Experiments on multiple LLMs and sparse autoencoders confirm that harmful features are geometrically closer.
  • The geometric trend generalizes across health, career, and legal advice domains.
  • Geometry-aware sample filtering reduces misalignment by 34.5%, outperforming random removal.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.