Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Understanding Asynchronous Inference Methods for Vision-Language-Action Models

Summary

A systematic comparison of four asynchronous inference methods for Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models—IT-RTC, TT-RTC, VLASH, and A2C2—shows that A2C2's per-step residual correction achieves the best performance on both Kinetix and LIBERO benchmarks, maintaining over 90% solve rate up to 8-step delays. TT-RTC is the most robust training-based method with zero inference overhead, while IT-RTC degrades under high delays. The study provides unified codebases for reproducible evaluation.

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Ayoub Agouzoul
Understanding Asynchronous Inference Methods for Vision-Language-Action Models
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.08168] Understanding Asynchronous Inference Methods for Vision-Language-Action Models

[Submitted on 4 May 2026]

Title:Understanding Asynchronous Inference Methods for Vision-Language-Action Models

View a PDF of the paper titled Understanding Asynchronous Inference Methods for Vision-Language-Action Models, by Ayoub Agouzoul

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models offer a promising path to generalist robot control, but their inference latency causes observation staleness when generated actions are executed asynchronously. Several methods have been proposed concurrently to mitigate this problem: inference-time inpainting (IT-RTC), training-time delay simulation (TT-RTC), future-state-aware conditioning (VLASH), and lightweight residual correction (A2C2). Each takes a fundamentally different approach, but they have so far been evaluated independently with different codebases, base policies, and protocols. We present a systematic comparison of these four methods under controlled conditions. We develop two unified codebases that integrate all methods with harmonized library and dataset versions, and we benchmark them on the Kinetix suite with MLPMixer policies and on the LIBERO manipulation benchmark with SmolVLA, sweeping inference delays up to $d=20$ control steps. A2C2's per-step residual correction is the most effective method on Kinetix, holding above 90% solve rate up to $d=8$, and also leads on LIBERO from $d=4$ onwards. IT-RTC is competitive at low delays but degrades sharply under long chunks ($H=30$) and high delays. TT-RTC is the most robust training-based method: stable across $d_\max$ choices, generalizes beyond its training delay distribution, and adds zero inference overhead. VLASH exhibits a clear low-delay vs. high-delay trade-off governed by the fine-tuning delay range $[0,d_\max]$. Code is available at this https URL

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.08168 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2605.08168v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.08168

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Ayoub Agouzoul [view email] [v1] Mon, 4 May 2026 18:01:15 UTC (319 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Understanding Asynchronous Inference Methods for Vision-Language-Action Models, by Ayoub Agouzoul

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • Four asynchronous inference methods for VLA models are compared: IT-RTC, TT-RTC, VLASH, and A2C2.
  • A2C2 achieves highest solve rates on Kinetix (90%+ up to d=8) and LIBERO (best from d=4 onward).
  • TT-RTC is the most robust training-based method, stable across delay settings with no inference cost.
  • IT-RTC performs well at low delays but degrades with long chunks and high delays.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.