AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Towards an Argumentative Foundation for Evaluative AI

arXiv:2608.07473v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluative AI (EAI) has been recently proposed as a way to support human decision-making, not by producing a single recommendation, but by presenting competing hypotheses together with evidence for and against each. In this position paper, we advocate (computational) argumentation as a particularly suitable paradigm to provide a formal, computable foundation for forms of EAI that are explainable and contestable, setting the ground for a long-term research agenda towards distributed and human-centred EAI systems.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Xiang Yin, Tim Miller, Nico Potyka, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni

-->

[Submitted on 25 Apr 2026]

Title:Towards an Argumentative Foundation for Evaluative AI

View a PDF of the paper titled Towards an Argumentative Foundation for Evaluative AI, by Xiang Yin and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Evaluative AI (EAI) has been recently proposed as a way to support human decision-making, not by producing a single recommendation, but by presenting competing hypotheses together with evidence for and against each. In this position paper, we advocate (computational) argumentation as a particularly suitable paradigm to provide a formal, computable foundation for forms of EAI that are explainable and contestable, setting the ground for a long-term research agenda towards distributed and human-centred EAI systems.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)

Cite as: arXiv:2608.07473 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2608.07473v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.07473

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Xiang Yin [view email] [v1] Sat, 25 Apr 2026 13:26:11 UTC (131 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Towards an Argumentative Foundation for Evaluative AI, by Xiang Yin and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-08

Change to browse by:

cs cs.MA

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)