Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source3 min read

The Cost of Context: Mitigating Textual Bias in Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Summary

Researchers identify and formalize 'recorruption' in multimodal RAG, where adding accurate context causes models to ignore correct predictions. They propose BAIR, a parameter-free framework that restores visual attention and applies positional penalties.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Hoin Jung, Xiaoqian Wang
The Cost of Context: Mitigating Textual Bias in Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.05594] The Cost of Context: Mitigating Textual Bias in Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Skip to main content

Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.

We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate

> cs > arXiv:2605.05594

Help | Advanced Search

All fields Title Author Abstract Comments Journal reference ACM classification MSC classification Report number arXiv identifier DOI ORCID arXiv author ID Help pages Full text

Search

GO

quick links

Login

Help Pages

About

-->

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2605.05594 (cs)

[Submitted on 7 May 2026]

Title:The Cost of Context: Mitigating Textual Bias in Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Authors:Hoin Jung, Xiaoqian Wang

View a PDF of the paper titled The Cost of Context: Mitigating Textual Bias in Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation, by Hoin Jung and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly integrated with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to mitigate hallucinations, the introduction of external documents can conceal severe failure modes at the instance level. We identify and formalize the phenomenon of recorruption, where the introduction of even perfectly accurate "oracle" context causes a capable model to abandon an initially correct prediction. Through a mechanistic diagnosis of internal attention matrices, we show that recorruption is driven by a two-fold attentional collapse: (1) visual blindness, characterized by the systemic suppression of visual attention mass ($M_{vis}$) and sharpness ($S_{vis}$), and (2) a structural positional bias that forces the model to prioritize boundary tokens over semantic relevance. Our analysis reveals an Illusion of Success, demonstrating that many seemingly correct RAG outcomes are merely positional coincidences where the model's textual copying bias happens to align with the ground-truth location. To address these vulnerabilities, we propose Bottleneck Attention Intervention for Recovery (BAIR), a parameter-free, inference-time framework that restores visual saliency and applies position-aware penalties to textual distractors. Across medical factuality, social fairness, and geospatial benchmarks, BAIR successfully restores multimodal grounding and improves diagnostic reliability without requiring model retraining or fine-tuning.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.05594 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.05594v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.05594

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Hoin Jung [view email] [v1] Thu, 7 May 2026 02:27:04 UTC (5,545 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled The Cost of Context: Mitigating Textual Bias in Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation, by Hoin Jung and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CV cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

About

Help

contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact

subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe

Copyright

Privacy Policy

Web Accessibility Assistance

arXiv Operational Status

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Recorruption phenomenon: adding oracle context leads to loss of correct predictions.
  • Two causes: visual blindness (suppression of visual attention) and positional bias (prioritizing boundary tokens).
  • Proposed BAIR framework restores visual saliency without retraining.
  • BAIR improves reliability in medical, social, and geospatial benchmarks.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.