Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Structured Authority Injection: Persistent Human Control for LLM Agents via Typed MCP Overrides

Summary

arXiv:2610.22373v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based agents are increasingly used as autonomous orchestrators in distributed and multi-agent systems, yet a control gap remains: no protocol-level mechanism allows human operators to inject binding directives that persist across planning cycles. Free-text overrides suffer from ambiguous interpretation due to lack of schema validation and from authority erosion as operator instructions lose influence within accumulating context. We propose Structured Authority Injection (SAI), a protocol that addresses these issues by routing operator corrections through typed, schema-validated Model Context Protocol (MCP) tool calls and maintaining a ranked authority context prepended to each LLM prompt. SAI defines three override classes (Constraint, P…

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Ryan Tran, YueMing Zhang, Lingfeng Tao, Nan Yang, Shengjie Xu, Yu Yin, Shuai Xu, Wenlu Zhang, Hailu Xu
Structured Authority Injection: Persistent Human Control for LLM Agents via Typed MCP Overrides
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 27 Jul 2026]

Title:Structured Authority Injection: Persistent Human Control for LLM Agents via Typed MCP Overrides

View a PDF of the paper titled Structured Authority Injection: Persistent Human Control for LLM Agents via Typed MCP Overrides, by Ryan Tran and 8 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:LLM-based agents are increasingly used as autonomous orchestrators in distributed and multi-agent systems, yet a control gap remains: no protocol-level mechanism allows human operators to inject binding directives that persist across planning cycles. Free-text overrides suffer from ambiguous interpretation due to lack of schema validation and from authority erosion as operator instructions lose influence within accumulating context. We propose Structured Authority Injection (SAI), a protocol that addresses these issues by routing operator corrections through typed, schema-validated Model Context Protocol (MCP) tool calls and maintaining a ranked authority context prepended to each LLM prompt. SAI defines three override classes (Constraint, Priority, and Strategy) with distinct persistence semantics and an explicit precedence order enforced via a directed authority channel inaccessible to the planning process. The method requires no model fine-tuning or access to model weights and applies to instruction-tuned LLMs supporting MCP tool use. Evaluation across nine LLMs and eight scenarios targeting agent failure modes shows reduced ambiguous directive interpretation and mitigated authority decay across planning iterations, with lower prompt overhead in the strongest models (up to 38% depending on model and scenario), though benefit varies substantially across models. SAI provides a general design pattern for agent systems requiring explicit and persistent human control.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.22373 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.22373v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.22373

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Hailu Xu [view email] [v1] Mon, 27 Jul 2026 03:38:01 UTC (536 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Structured Authority Injection: Persistent Human Control for LLM Agents via Typed MCP Overrides, by Ryan Tran and 8 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.22373v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based agents are increasingly used as autonomous orchestrators in distributed and multi-agent systems, yet a control gap remain…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.