Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Statistical Inference and Quality Measures of KV Cache Quantisations Inspired by TurboQuant

Summary

This paper analyzes three KV cache quantization schemes (KV, KQV, QKQV) under a fair bit budget. Using the Beta distribution on the hypersphere, it traces how QJL inflates inner product variance by π/2, which softmax amplifies nonlinearly via Jensen's inequality. Empirical findings show that at n=4 KQV wins on all measures; K-V asymmetry is unconditional; and a budget-dependent crossover exists. A sufficient condition is presented explaining the Jensen mechanism as the cause of the crossover.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Paolo D'Alberto
Statistical Inference and Quality Measures of KV Cache Quantisations Inspired by TurboQuant
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.08114] Statistical Inference and Quality Measures of KV Cache Quantisations Inspired by TurboQuant

[Submitted on 27 Apr 2026]

Title:Statistical Inference and Quality Measures of KV Cache Quantisations Inspired by TurboQuant

View a PDF of the paper titled Statistical Inference and Quality Measures of KV Cache Quantisations Inspired by TurboQuant, by Paolo D'Alberto

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:We analyse three KV cache quantization schemes under a fair bit budget: \textbf{KV} (scalar MSE baseline), \textbf{KQV} (WHT + MSE on $K$; WHT + MSE + QJL on $V$), and \textbf{QKQV} (WHT + MSE + QJL on both). Starting from the Beta distribution on the hypersphere, we trace how QJL on $K$ inflates inner product variance by $\pi/2$, which softmax amplifies nonlinearly via Jensen's inequality, and we present statistical inference and information metrics to highlight practical differences.

Three empirical findings emerge. (1)~At $n=4$ (the practically dominant budget), KQV wins on every measure -- KL divergence, geometric $K$ error, and 6D distance -- across all distributions and ranks tested. (2)~The K--V asymmetry is unconditional: QKQV is consistently worse than KQV in KL divergence at every budget and distribution. (3)~A budget-dependent crossover exists: QKQV achieves better geometric $K$ reconstruction at $n \in \{2,3,5\}$, KQV at $n \in \{4,6\}$, invariant to rank and tail weight -- an open rate-distortion problem.

$\mathrm{KL}(p_{\mathrm{ref}} \| p_{\mathrm{quant}})$, K-only by construction, bridges K direction error to routing corruption and output collapse. We present a sufficient condition when the Jensen mechanism amplifies superlinearly through the softmax. At $n \in \{2,3,5\}$, QKQV wins geometrically because this assumption does not bind. At $n=4$, elevated K error and KL divergence for QKQV strongly suggest the Jensen mechanism is the operative cause of the crossover, providing a new perspective and explanation.

Comments: 23 pages, 7 Figures, multiple tables, the process is highly assisted by AI

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Information Theory (cs.IT); Mathematical Software (cs.MS)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.08114 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2605.08114v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.08114

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Paolo D'Alberto [view email] [v1] Mon, 27 Apr 2026 23:11:12 UTC (1,119 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Statistical Inference and Quality Measures of KV Cache Quantisations Inspired by TurboQuant, by Paolo D'Alberto

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.IT cs.MS math math.IT

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • At the practically dominant budget n=4, KQV outperforms other schemes on KL divergence, geometric K error, and 6D distance.
  • QKQV consistently yields higher KL divergence than KQV across all budgets and distributions, indicating unconditional K-V asymmetry.
  • A budget-dependent crossover exists: QKQV achieves better geometric K reconstruction at n=2,3,5, while KQV wins at n=4,6.
  • KL divergence, which depends only on K, bridges K direction error to routing corruption and output collapse, with the Jensen mechanism driving the crossover.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.