Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

SlackBench: Benchmarking Agents on Collaborative Projects Grounded in Real Code Repositories

Summary

SlackBench is a new benchmark for evaluating AI agents on realistic research and engineering workflows that require joint reasoning over workplace communication and evolving repository state. Grounded in privacy-preserving reenactments of real academic projects, it includes 140 queries covering heterogeneous-source search, abstention, summarization, and circumstance inference. Across 33 frontier models and agent harnesses, the best system scores around 80% and most fall below 66%, highlighting substantial headroom.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Mingxuan Li, Huanzhi Mao, Ruitao Zheng, Jarod Stanbury James, Yunze Li, Natanya Anderson, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Alex Dimakis
SlackBench: Benchmarking Agents on Collaborative Projects Grounded in Real Code Repositories
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 3 Nov 2026]

Title:SlackBench: Benchmarking Agents on Collaborative Projects Grounded in Real Code Repositories

View a PDF of the paper titled SlackBench: Benchmarking Agents on Collaborative Projects Grounded in Real Code Repositories, by Mingxuan Li and 7 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:AI Agents are becoming digital coworkers that can browse the web, write code, run experiments, and assist humans over extended horizons. Yet existing benchmarks fall short of real knowledge work: many rely on synthetic data or isolated tasks, missing the complex, multi-party dynamics of collaborative projects, where critical information is scattered across conversations, code, and evolving decisions. Even simple workplace questions may require locating relevant channels and direct messages, recovering context from long discussions, inspecting repository state, reconciling stale or conflicting evidence, and synthesizing across sources.

We introduce SlackBench, a benchmark for evaluating agents on realistic research and engineering workflows that require joint reasoning over workplace communication and evolving repository state. Grounded in privacy-preserving reenactments of real academic research projects, SlackBench provides reproducible environments with realistic multi-party dialogue, evolving decisions, and corresponding code changes grounded in GitHub repositories and Google Docs. It contains 140 queries spanning heterogeneous-source agentic search, abstention on unanswerable or false-premise questions, goal-directed summarization, and circumstance inference over long conversations. These tasks are not reducible to static corpus question answering: agents must determine which conversations matter, traverse threads, inspect repository state, and synthesize evidence across communication and code artifacts. Across 33 frontier models and agent harnesses, the best system scores around 80% and most agents score below 66%, highlighting substantial headroom for improvement. SlackBench thus provides an extensible framework for evaluating agents in collaborative work environments. The SlackBench dataset is available at this https URL .

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2611.05512 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2611.05512v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.05512

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Mingxuan Li [view email] [v1] Tue, 3 Nov 2026 19:10:50 UTC (8,048 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled SlackBench: Benchmarking Agents on Collaborative Projects Grounded in Real Code Repositories, by Mingxuan Li and 7 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-11

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CL

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • SlackBench features 140 queries across four task types: heterogeneous-source agentic search, abstention, goal-directed summarization, and circumstance inference.
  • Environments are privacy-preserving reenactments of real academic projects with multi-party dialogue, evolving decisions, and corresponding code changes in GitHub and Google Docs.
  • The best of 33 frontier models and agent harnesses scores about 80%, while most score below 66%.
  • The dataset is publicly available on Hugging Face, providing an extensible framework for evaluating agents in collaborative work environments.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.

SlackBench: Benchmarking Agents on Collaborative Projects Grounded in Real Code Repositories | AI News Hub