AI News HubLIVE
In-site rewrite3 min read

Show HN: An AI video prompt cookbook for image-to-video workflows

A practical prompt pattern collection for creators, marketers, and small content teams working with image-to-video and text-to-video AI workflows. It includes a prompt card format, example prompts for product ads and UGC-style hooks, a same-prompt model testing method, an evaluation scorecard, and failure notes.

SourceHacker News AIAuthor: Ash_yasuomang

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

Fork 0

Star 0

BranchesTags

Open more actions menu

Folders and files

NameName

Last commit message

Last commit date

Latest commit

History

3 Commits

3 Commits

evaluations

evaluations

examples

examples

prompts

prompts

LICENSE

LICENSE

README.md

README.md

Repository files navigation

Practical prompt patterns for creators testing image-to-video and text-to-video workflows.

This cookbook is for creators, marketers, and small content teams who need usable AI video clips, not one-off demo prompts. It focuses on source image prep, motion wording, preservation constraints, repeatable testing, and failure review.

Who This Is For

Product marketers turning one product image into a short ad clip.

Social creators testing hooks, UGC-style motion, and vertical framing.

Brand teams that need a repeatable way to compare AI video outputs.

Editors who need clips that can still be cropped, captioned, and reused.

This is not an API integration guide. The goal is to make prompt testing easier for people who judge the output visually.

Prompt Card Format

Use one prompt card per test so the idea, constraints, and result stay connected.

Clip job: Source image: Subject to preserve: Motion: Camera: Framing: Style: Negative constraints: Success criteria: Result notes: Next change:

The two most important fields are Subject to preserve and Motion. Many weak AI video prompts describe the image again, but they do not explain what should move.

Image-to-Video Product Prompt

Use this when the source image is already the creative anchor.

Clip job: 5-second vertical product ad. Source image: one clear studio image of the product. Subject to preserve: keep the product shape, cap, label, color, and position unchanged. Motion: soft light sweeps across the product surface while small background shadows move naturally. Camera: slow push-in with stable framing. Framing: 9:16 vertical, leave clean space near the top for a caption. Style: realistic ecommerce product video, polished but not over-stylized. Negative constraints: no extra objects, no label distortion, no melted edges, no background replacement. Success criteria: product stays recognizable and the clip can be used in a short ad edit.

UGC-Style Hook Prompt

Use this when the output needs to feel like a creator shot, but the product still needs to stay readable.

Clip job: creator-style social hook for a product recommendation. Source image: product held near a simple tabletop background. Subject to preserve: keep the product label, package shape, and hand position stable. Motion: subtle handheld movement, product tilts slightly toward camera, natural light shifts. Camera: close vertical phone shot, mild handheld energy, no dramatic zoom. Framing: 9:16, product centered, room for captions on the lower third. Style: clean UGC product clip, realistic, casual, not cinematic. Negative constraints: no fake text overlays, no changed packaging, no extra hands, no warped fingers. Success criteria: the product is readable in the first second and can support a voiceover.

Same-Prompt Model Test

When comparing models, keep the job and prompt stable. Do not change the prompt after seeing the first result, or the comparison becomes a prompt rewrite test instead of a model comparison.

Test name: Product bottle, slow push-in, vertical ad. Input: same source image for every model. Prompt version: v1, unchanged for the first round. Models tested: Model A, Model B, Model C. Scoring: subject fidelity, motion coherence, prompt adherence, editability, retry cost. Decision: keep, retry with constraints, or reject for this job.

Evaluation Scorecard

Criterion Weight What to Check

Subject fidelity 30% Product, character, or object stays recognizable

Motion usefulness 20% Motion starts early and supports the clip job

Prompt adherence 20% Camera, framing, and constraints are followed

Editability 20% Clip can be captioned, cropped, or placed in a sequence

Retry cost 10% Number of regenerations needed for a usable result

Do not keep a clip just because it looks impressive. Keep it only if it solves the original clip job.

Failure Notes

Failure What It Looks Like Next Prompt Change

Product drift Shape, color, or label changes Add stricter preservation constraints and simplify the source image

Background takeover Background moves more than the subject Ask for subtle environmental motion and no background replacement

Text distortion Labels or UI text becomes unreadable Avoid generating new text; add text later in editing

Motion too static First seconds barely move Describe motion that starts immediately

Over-cinematic output Clip looks like a trailer, not a usable ad Lower style intensity and specify platform/use case

Suggested Folder Structure

ai-video-prompt-cookbook/ product-video-prompts/ ugc-ad-prompts/ same-prompt-tests/ failure-notes/ scorecards/

Related LumiYing Resource

Image-to-video workflow: https://lumiying.com/tools/image-to-video

License

MIT for prompt templates and scorecard structures. Adapt them to your own product, brand, safety rules, and editing workflow.

About

Practical prompt patterns for image-to-video and text-to-video workflows.

Resources

Readme

License

MIT license

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Activity

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

0 forks

Report repository

Releases

No releases published

Packages 0

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Contributors

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.