Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Shaping & Monitoring Models through their Internal Representations

Summary

Thomas Fel and 25 co-authors introduce Mechanistic Shaping, a framework that uses internal representations during training to make models follow specifications about which concepts they express and rely on. Experiments across vision, medical imaging, language, scales up to 32B parameters, and training paradigms (classification, SFT, DPO, GRPO) show substantial reduction in targeted behaviors while preserving task performance. The authors further introduce a hierarchy of monitors to distinguish concepts that escape a probe from those truly gone, characterize three geometric circumvention mechanisms (drift, erasure, nonlinear encoding), and find that shaped concepts largely remain monitorable.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Thomas Fel, Matthew Kowal, Matt Feiszli, Satchel Grant, Andrew Lee, Chris Earls, Fatih Dinc, Vasudev Shyam, Usha Bhalla, Leon Bergen, Siddharth Boppana, Ching Fang, Michael Byun, Tristan Gallent, Nicholas Wang, Tal Haklay, Dron Hazra, Neehar Kondapaneni, Connor Watts, Ryan Panwar, Thomas Dooms, Jack Merullo, Atticus Geiger, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Thomas McGrath, Owen Lewis
Shaping & Monitoring Models through their Internal Representations
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 4 Nov 2026]

Title:Shaping & Monitoring Models through their Internal Representations

View a PDF of the paper titled Shaping & Monitoring Models through their Internal Representations, by Thomas Fel and 25 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:We propose Mechanistic Shaping, a unified framework for shaping models through their internal representations. Mechanistic Shaping is applied during training so that models follow specifications (rules) about which concepts they express, measured via their outputs or internal representations (e.g., no harmful content), and also which concepts they rely on, i.e., what they use to make their decisions (e.g., not a candidate's gender when screening a résumé). Across multiple domains (vision, medical imaging, language), scales (up to 32B parameters), and training paradigms (classification, SFT, DPO, GRPO), we find that Mechanistic Shaping substantially reduces targeted behaviors while preserving task performance. Since training against a representation can also modify it, we ask whether shaped concepts remain monitorable, a question that depends on the class of monitors considered. We therefore introduce a hierarchy of such classes, which separates a concept that escapes one probe from a concept that is truly gone. We characterize three geometric mechanisms of circumvention: the concept can drift away from the monitor, be erased from the layer, or persist in higher-order statistics as a nonlinear encoding, which we explain through a product-code construction. Although other mechanisms may arise in different settings or at larger scales, these three account for all of our observations, and each can be detected by a matching monitor. In practice, we find that shaped concepts largely remain monitorable: refitted linear probes recover the concept in most settings, and the original probe remains reliable whenever gradients do not flow through it. Taken together, these results point to the potential of using interpretability as a tool for training, and call for a correspondingly rigorous science of interpretability-based training.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2611.07071 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2611.07071v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.07071

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Thomas Fel [view email] [v1] Wed, 4 Nov 2026 19:29:13 UTC (19,265 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Shaping & Monitoring Models through their Internal Representations, by Thomas Fel and 25 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-11

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

ResearchersAdvanced

Key points

  • Mechanistic Shaping constrains both expressed and relied-upon concepts during training, covering multiple domains, scales, and paradigms.
  • The method substantially reduces targeted behaviors while preserving task performance in experiments.
  • A hierarchy of monitors distinguishes concept escape from true disappearance, and three geometric circumvention mechanisms are identified.
  • Shaped concepts remain largely monitorable: refitted linear probes recover them in most settings, and the original probe stays reliable when gradients do not flow through it.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.

Shaping & Monitoring Models through their Internal Representations | AI News Hub