Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Self-Prompting Small Language Models for Privacy-Sensitive Clinical Information Extraction

Summary

A new framework enables small language models to self-generate, verify, and refine prompts for extracting clinical entities from dental notes. Using 1,200 annotated notes, Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct achieved micro/macro F1 scores of 0.864/0.837 after direct preference optimization, demonstrating feasibility for local deployment.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Yao-Shun Chuang, Tushti Mody, Uday Pratap Singh, Shirindokht Shiraz, Chun-Teh Lee, Ryan Brandon, Muhammad F Walji, Xiaoqian Jiang, Bunmi Tokede
Self-Prompting Small Language Models for Privacy-Sensitive Clinical Information Extraction
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.04221] Self-Prompting Small Language Models for Privacy-Sensitive Clinical Information Extraction

Skip to main content

Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.

We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate

> cs > arXiv:2605.04221

Help | Advanced Search

All fields Title Author Abstract Comments Journal reference ACM classification MSC classification Report number arXiv identifier DOI ORCID arXiv author ID Help pages Full text

Search

GO

quick links

Login

Help Pages

About

-->

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2605.04221 (cs)

[Submitted on 5 May 2026]

Title:Self-Prompting Small Language Models for Privacy-Sensitive Clinical Information Extraction

Authors:Yao-Shun Chuang, Tushti Mody, Uday Pratap Singh, Shirindokht Shiraz, Chun-Teh Lee, Ryan Brandon, Muhammad F Walji, Xiaoqian Jiang, Bunmi Tokede

View a PDF of the paper titled Self-Prompting Small Language Models for Privacy-Sensitive Clinical Information Extraction, by Yao-Shun Chuang and 8 other authors

View PDF

Abstract:Clinical named entity recognition from dental progress notes is challenging because documentation is highly unstructured, domain-specific, and often privacy-sensitive. We developed a locally deployable framework that enables small language models to self-generate, verify, refine, and evaluate entity-specific prompts for extracting multiple clinical entities from dental notes. Using 1,200 annotated notes, we evaluated candidate open-weight models with multi-prompt ensemble inference and further adapted selected models using QLoRA-based supervised fine-tuning and direct preference optimization. Model performance varied substantially, highlighting the need for task-specific evaluation rather than reliance on generic benchmarks. Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct achieved the strongest baseline performance. After DPO, Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct achieved micro/macro F1 scores of 0.864/0.837 and 0.806/0.797, respectively. These findings suggest that automated prompt optimization combined with lightweight preference-based post-training can support scalable clinical information extraction using locally deployed small language models.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.04221 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.04221v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.04221

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Yao-Shun Chuang [view email] [v1] Tue, 5 May 2026 19:03:40 UTC (1,348 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Self-Prompting Small Language Models for Privacy-Sensitive Clinical Information Extraction, by Yao-Shun Chuang and 8 other authors

View PDF

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

About

Help

contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact

subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe

Copyright

Privacy Policy

Web Accessibility Assistance

arXiv Operational Status

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Framework uses self-prompting, multi-prompt ensemble, and preference optimization.
  • Evaluated on 1,200 annotated dental progress notes.
  • Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct achieves best F1 scores (micro 0.864, macro 0.837) after DPO.
  • Enables scalable clinical information extraction with locally deployed small models.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.