[2605.08346] Sanity Checks for Long-Form Hallucination Detection
[Submitted on 8 May 2026]
Title:Sanity Checks for Long-Form Hallucination Detection
View a PDF of the paper titled Sanity Checks for Long-Form Hallucination Detection, by Geigh Zollicoffer and 4 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Hallucination detection methods for large language models increasingly operate on chain-of-thought reasoning traces, yet it remains unclear whether they evaluate the reasoning itself or merely exploit surface correlates of the final answer. We introduce a controlled-invariance methodology that exposes this distinction through two oracle tests: \textsc{Force}, which replaces each response's final answer with the ground truth while preserving the reasoning trace, and \textsc{Remove}, which strips answer-announcement steps while leaving the trajectory intact. This reveals if their predictive power derives from answer-level artifacts rather than from the structure or validity of intermediate reasoning. We further show that once these artifacts are controlled for, effective detection does not necessarily require complex learned representations: TRACT, a lightweight scorer built on lexical trajectory features (hedging trends, step-length dynamics, and cross-response vocabulary convergence), achieves strong robustness while remaining competitive with or outperforming existing baselines on unperturbed traces. These findings suggest that the current central challenge in reasoning-aware hallucination detection is not the absence of signal in the trace, but the failure to isolate it from endpoint cues.
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.08346 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2605.08346v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.08346
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Manish Bhattarai [view email] [v1] Fri, 8 May 2026 18:00:58 UTC (3,834 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Sanity Checks for Long-Form Hallucination Detection, by Geigh Zollicoffer and 4 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs cs.AI
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)