Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source3 min read

Same Origin, Different Verdicts: Text Production Conditions Confound Machine-Generated Text Detection in Russian

Summary

A study on Russian machine-generated text detection finds that production conditions significantly shift detection scores even when origin is fixed, with disagreement among four operationalizations and a flip from machine to human verdict caused solely by removing emphasis markers.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Stanislav Kirichenko
Same Origin, Different Verdicts: Text Production Conditions Confound Machine-Generated Text Detection in Russian
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 3 Aug 2026]

Title:Same Origin, Different Verdicts: Text Production Conditions Confound Machine-Generated Text Detection in Russian

View a PDF of the paper titled Same Origin, Different Verdicts: Text Production Conditions Confound Machine-Generated Text Detection in Russian, by Stanislav Kirichenko

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Automated detection of machine-generated text is applied where the verdict carries a cost for the author, yet origin is a property of the production process, not an observable property of the text. The conditions under which a text is produced push it in the same direction in which a generative model is presumed to push it. This study measures the contribution of these conditions while origin is held fixed. The Russian-language corpus of 1882 documents comprises a machine part, generated by four generation channels (each backed by its own model family) across 45 tasks in three task modes, and an archival human part annotated for source regimentation level before the texts were read. The primary contrast is computed within the machine corpus: both halves of a pair are generated by the same model for the same task and differ only in task wording. Machine-likeness is measured by four operationalisations: an interpretable index with weights fixed before data collection, a trained classifier, a zero-shot metric on an open model, a judge model. The main result is disagreement between procedures: changing the task mode shifted the scores of all four, but three gave a negative shift, the judge a positive one, and none of the four intervals covers zero. The comparison plan and the specifications of procedures 2-4 were fixed after the result of procedure 1, before procedures 2-4 ran; the disagreement survived correction of a corpus defect and of the nested validation. A baseline on the source identifier alone reaches a median AUROC of 1.0000 on the thirteen group splits where it is defined, and removing emphasis markers flipped a confident machine verdict to human without changing the full text by a single character. The scores are properties of a specific measurement system and corpus: they reflect data collection, repetition, formatting, and preprocessing decisions as well as linguistic style.

Comments: 65 pages, 6 figures, 24 tables. English translation of the frozen Russian manuscript; the Russian text is the source of record and is available with all data, code and run manifests at this https URL (v1.0.1)

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2611.05385 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2611.05385v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.05385

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Stanislav Kirichenko [view email] [v1] Mon, 3 Aug 2026 09:03:28 UTC (115 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Same Origin, Different Verdicts: Text Production Conditions Confound Machine-Generated Text Detection in Russian, by Stanislav Kirichenko

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-11

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Changing task mode shifted all four detection scores, but three negatively and one positively, with no interval covering zero.
  • A baseline on source identifier alone reaches median AUROC 1.0000 on thirteen group splits.
  • Removing emphasis markers flipped a confident machine verdict to human without altering a single character of the full text.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.