Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

SAGE: A hybrid vision-language and geometry framework for work-zone pathway prediction under temporary traffic control

Summary

SAGE uses a vision-language model's trajectory as a preference over intact geometric candidates and enforces MUTCD-derived checks, cutting displacement errors and hard-constraint violations on real-world ROADWork data.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Jiaxi Liu, Keshu Wu, Weizhe Tang, Bofeng Cao, Sikai Chen, Xiaopeng Li, Steven T. Parker, Bin Ran
SAGE: A hybrid vision-language and geometry framework for work-zone pathway prediction under temporary traffic control
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 22 Oct 2026]

Title:SAGE: A hybrid vision-language and geometry framework for work-zone pathway prediction under temporary traffic control

View a PDF of the paper titled SAGE: A hybrid vision-language and geometry framework for work-zone pathway prediction under temporary traffic control, by Jiaxi Liu and 7 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Temporary traffic control redirects vehicles through work zones, requiring automated vehicles to connect an interpretation of the visible devices to a continuous passing path. Geometric predictors can provide several plausible paths, yet selecting the one consistent with the temporary control remains difficult. We propose SAGE (Semantic-to-Action Grounded Execution), a read-decide-execute-check framework that separates path construction, path preference, and control compliance within a shared candidate space. The central idea is to use a vision-language model's (VLM's) trajectory as a preference over intact geometric candidates. A role-decoupled generator constructs the candidates, and rank fusion combines each candidate's geometric score with its agreement with the VLM trajectory. Supervision structured around the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) trains SAGE-VLM to state the lane status and hazard side before its passage decision and trajectory. The predicted hazard side enters image-space predicates derived from MUTCD provisions, which support a final intervention bounded in score and displacement. On 2,306 real-world ROADWork validation episodes, the candidates include a path within 10 px of the human demonstration in 87% of episodes, yet selection regret accounts for 53% of the geometric ranker's error. SAGE reduces average and final displacement errors by 8.3% and 12.0% relative to the ranker, mostly in the far field, and hard-constraint violations by 37%. The trajectory opinion improves all four tested generator-selector combinations. SAGE is comparable to state-of-the-art VLM modules in accuracy, with a faster-responding VLM, and outperforms four other adapted driving VLMs in displacement error and safety measures. Project page: this https URL.

Comments: 26 pages, 9 figures, 7 tables. Project page: this https URL

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Robotics (cs.RO)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.31835 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.31835v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.31835

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jiaxi Liu [view email] [v1] Thu, 22 Oct 2026 19:14:17 UTC (18,015 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled SAGE: A hybrid vision-language and geometry framework for work-zone pathway prediction under temporary traffic control, by Jiaxi Liu and 7 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.RO

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Separates path construction, preference selection, and control compliance in a shared candidate space
  • Combines geometric scores with agreement to VLM trajectories via rank fusion
  • Reduces average and final displacement errors by 8.3% and 12.0% versus the geometric ranker
  • Cuts hard-constraint violations by 37% and outperforms four adapted driving VLMs

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.