AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

SAAG: Structured Agent Assessment and Grounding

SAAG proposes a cascaded diagnostic framework that decomposes agent-calling evaluation into three interpretable stages: registry conformance, structural completeness, and argument grounding, with iterative self-repair guided by stage-specific signals, improving argument precision and reducing hallucination.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Ritvik Garimella, Vedant Khandelwal, Anvi Kohli, Amit Sheth

-->

[Submitted on 30 Apr 2026]

Title:SAAG: Structured Agent Assessment and Grounding

View a PDF of the paper titled SAAG: Structured Agent Assessment and Grounding, by Ritvik Garimella and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Exact-match evaluation of agent-calling obscures qualitatively different failure modes: a model may select the right function yet hallucinate argument values, or satisfy a schema while choosing a agent for the wrong reason. Existing benchmarks collapse these distinctions into a single binary score, leaving practitioners unable to diagnose where agent calls fail. We propose SAAG a cascaded diagnostic framework that decomposes agent-calling evaluation into three sequential stages: registry conformance, structural completeness, and argument grounding, each producing interpretable stage-specific diagnostics. These diagnostics additionally enable iterative self-repair: on prediction failure, the stage-specific signal guides targeted correction without leaking ground-truth values. We evaluate this framework on a controlled benchmark derived from Glaive's function-calling dataset across registry sizes of 5, 10, and 15 agents using three local sub-4B-parameter models. Structured feedback consistently improves argument precision and reduces value hallucination relative to single-pass inference and uninformative binary feedback, while end-to-end F1 gains are modest and model-dependent. These results suggest that stage-decomposed diagnostic evaluation is a necessary lens for understanding and improving agent-calling reliability across model families and registry scales.

Comments: Accepted to KnowFM @ ACL 2026 workshop (Non-Archival). 16 pages in total

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.18245 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2607.18245v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.18245

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Ritvik Garimella [view email] [v1] Thu, 30 Apr 2026 19:33:58 UTC (1,035 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled SAAG: Structured Agent Assessment and Grounding, by Ritvik Garimella and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)