Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Rollback: Experience Backtracking in World Models for Policy Improvement

Summary

The paper introduces Rollback, a policy improvement paradigm that turns action-conditioned world models from forward-only simulators into counterfactual engines that rewind to critical decision points and branch into alternative actions. On three real-world robot tasks it outperforms the strongest baseline by absolute success-rate gains of 10.67%, 11.11%, and 11.85%.

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Jiayi Luo, Yang Zhang, Liliang Chen, Nan Wang, Chen Gao, Boxiang Qiu, Zhuoxuan Li, Baorui Peng, Chuankang Li, Yuxiang Yan, Si Liu, Qingyun Sun, Shuicheng Yan, Maoqing Yao, Jianxin Li, Guanghui Ren
Rollback: Experience Backtracking in World Models for Policy Improvement
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 26 Oct 2026]

Title:Rollback: Experience Backtracking in World Models for Policy Improvement

View a PDF of the paper titled Rollback: Experience Backtracking in World Models for Policy Improvement, by Jiayi Luo and 15 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Action-conditioned world models offer a scalable alternative to costly real-world interaction for improving robot policies. However, existing world-model-based methods largely treat world models as forward-only surrogates of the physical environment, leaving untapped a capability no physical environment affords: rewinding to past decision points to explore counterfactual futures. We introduce Rollback, a policy improvement paradigm that turns world models from passive simulators into counterfactual engines: it rolls back to critical decision points, branches into alternative actions, and contrasts their outcomes to attribute success to individual decisions. This concentrates imagination where it matters most and distills counterfactual outcomes into fine-grained, action-level supervision without a separately learned value model. We build a scalable training system that unifies distributed world-model search with asynchronous real-robot execution, forming a self-reinforcing cycle: real-world experience continually sharpens the world model, and a sharper world model in turn drives further policy improvement. We term the world-model side of this cycle test-time physics grounding, a capability that hand-built physics simulators lack: while the world model serves as the training environment, real transitions from the policy it trains correct its dynamics through a lightweight LoRA pipeline. Experiments on three challenging real-world tasks show that Rollback improves success rates over the strongest baseline by an absolute 10.67%, 11.11%, and 11.85% on block extraction, ball tossing, and tabletop curling, respectively, while achieving more stable improvement throughout training. Although initialized from teleoperated demonstrations far below human level, Rollback surpasses the average success rate of human players on both ball tossing and tabletop curling within 8 hours of training.

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.36068 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2610.36068v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.36068

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jiayi Luo [view email] [v1] Mon, 26 Oct 2026 18:01:02 UTC (15,362 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Rollback: Experience Backtracking in World Models for Policy Improvement, by Jiayi Luo and 15 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.LG

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

ResearchersAdvanced

Key points

  • Rollback rewinds world models to key decision points and branches into alternative actions, concentrating imagination where it matters and providing action-level supervision without a separate value model.
  • A scalable training system unifies distributed world-model search with asynchronous real-robot execution, forming a self-reinforcing loop between real experience and world-model accuracy.
  • It improves success rates over the strongest baseline by 10.67%, 11.11%, and 11.85% on block extraction, ball tossing, and tabletop curling.
  • Starting from teleoperated demonstrations far below human level, it surpasses average human players on ball tossing and tabletop curling within 8 hours of training.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.