AI 服務暫時不可用，以下為來源正文，待恢復後補全翻譯。
A quote from Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang Simon Willison’s Weblog Newsletter 16th October 2026 We think "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for "what could go wrong with this change, and which check—automated or human—is the right one to catch it?" Asking that question also changed when review happens. Before, review was a gate at the end of the road: write the code, open a PR, wait for your colleague. Now, review runs continuously, more like spellcheck while you write. Most changes have been reviewed and fixed by Claude at least once before a human is asked to look. This catches most routine mistakes, and saves team attention for higher-level questions and scrutiny. — Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang, How the Claude Code team does code review Recent articles Hello Python 3.15, goodbye 3.10, and now I can use 3.11 - 12th October 2026 A new feature for my blog, built using my voice - 9th October 2026 Claude Haiku 5.5 - 7th October 2026 We're going to need default hard budget caps on pretty much everything - 3rd October 2026 This is a quotation collected by Simon Willison, posted on 16th October 2026. code-review 20 ai 2,285 generative-ai 2,027 llms 1,993 anthropic 350 claude 319 addy-osmani 8 coding-agents 259 claude-code 131 agentic-engineering 67 Disclosures Colophon © 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026