Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Post-Generation Curation of Synthetic Images via Homogeneous-Heterogeneous Splitting

Summary

A new generator-agnostic method selects the most informative synthetic images from a fixed pool by splitting classes into homogeneous and heterogeneous subsets, improving downstream task performance with up to 40% fewer samples.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Disheng Liu, Tuo Liang, Chaoda Song, Yu Yin
Post-Generation Curation of Synthetic Images via Homogeneous-Heterogeneous Splitting
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 2 Jul 2026]

Title:Post-Generation Curation of Synthetic Images via Homogeneous-Heterogeneous Splitting

View a PDF of the paper titled Post-Generation Curation of Synthetic Images via Homogeneous-Heterogeneous Splitting, by Disheng Liu and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Recent generative models can produce high-quality synthetic images, offering scalable training training data for data-hungry models. Existing approaches to exploiting this potential typically involve 1) training or fine-tuning generators, or 2) using lightweight post-hoc adaptation like prompt engineering or inference-time guidance, making them generator-specific and expertise-intensive. We study a complementary question: given a fixed pool of generated images, can downstream utility be improved purely by selecting an informative subset? The answer is yes. We show that effective selection must counter a structural bias of modern generators: they tend to over-produce canonical modes of each class while underrepresenting intra-class variation. Building on this insight, we split each real class into a canonical Homogeneous (HO) subset and a non-redundant Heterogeneous (HE) subset, then score synthetic images by a fidelity-diversity criterion that rewards semantic alignment while penalizing canonical redundancy. The method is generator-agnostic and requires no retraining. Across multiple benchmarks, it consistently outperforms state-of-the-art data selection baselines and matches the real-data performance with up to 40% fewer synthetic samples. The same criterion remains effective when applied on top of stronger task-tuned generators, with gains on both classification and segmentation tasks. Post-generation selection is therefore not a substitute for better generators, but a complementary mechanism for improving the utility of synthetic data.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.02637 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.02637v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.02637

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Disheng Liu [view email] [v1] Thu, 2 Jul 2026 15:34:46 UTC (19,505 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Post-Generation Curation of Synthetic Images via Homogeneous-Heterogeneous Splitting, by Disheng Liu and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Proposes a post-generation curation method that selects informative subsets of synthetic images.
  • Splits classes into Homogeneous (canonical) and Heterogeneous (non-redundant) subsets for scoring.
  • Achieves performance matching real data with 40% fewer synthetic samples across classification and segmentation tasks.
  • Generator-agnostic and requires no retraining.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.