AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Position: RL Researchers Need to Distinguish Between Solving Simulators and Using Simulators as a Proxy

This position paper argues that reinforcement learning researchers often conflate two distinct uses of simulators: solving the simulator as an end in itself, and using it as a proxy for real-world deployment. Through experiments and examples, the authors show that failing to distinguish these settings can lead to misleading conclusions, and call for clearer empirical practices.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Matthew Vandergrift, Esraa Elelimy, Martha White

[2606.28433] Position: RL Researchers Need to Distinguish Between Solving Simulators and Using Simulators as a Proxy

[Submitted on 26 Jun 2026]

Title:Position: RL Researchers Need to Distinguish Between Solving Simulators and Using Simulators as a Proxy

View a PDF of the paper titled Position: RL Researchers Need to Distinguish Between Solving Simulators and Using Simulators as a Proxy, by Matthew Vandergrift and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:One goal in reinforcement learning (RL) research is to understand general-purpose sequential decision-making, using benchmark simulators as a proxy for learning in deployment settings. When running experiments, however, the goal of achieving high performance in the simulator can mutate into focusing exclusively on solving the simulator. To achieve high scores, researchers may adopt solutions exclusively meant for solving simulators, rather than learning while the agent is deployed outside a simulator. Solving simulators is also worthy of investigation, but it is a fundamentally different RL research question. In this paper, we argue that RL researchers need to distinguish between two use cases of simulators: solving simulators and using simulators as a proxy for learning in deployment. We first discuss how these two use-cases are importantly different, in terms of constraints on how the agent can use the simulator, which algorithms are appropriate, and which evaluation metrics are appropriate. We then highlight several issues and misleading conclusions that can occur by not making the distinction between these two settings clear, supported with examples and simple experiments. This work is a call to the community to begin clearly distinguishing how they are using simulators in their work, hopefully sparking further discussion on which empirical practices work best in each setting.

Comments: This work has been accepted at the ICML 2026 position paper track. The peer reviewed reference is provided in the public OpenReview page at this https URL Additionally the publication can be seen at this link : this https URL

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2606.28433 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2606.28433v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.28433

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Journal reference: ICML, 2026

Submission history

From: Matthew Vandergrift [view email] [v1] Fri, 26 Jun 2026 03:19:27 UTC (369 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Position: RL Researchers Need to Distinguish Between Solving Simulators and Using Simulators as a Proxy, by Matthew Vandergrift and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-06

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)